Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24314033›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2013

Fragment assignment in the cloud with eXpress-D.

Adam Roberts, Harvey Feng, Lior Pachter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Large scale microbiome profiling in the cloud.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2019
    Article
  4. The draft genome of Ruellia speciosa (Beautiful Wild Petunia: Acanthaceae).DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2017
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Adam Roberts
Harvey Feng
Lior PachterDepartment of Computer Science, 387 Soda Hall, UC Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA. lpachter@math.berkeley.edu.

Funding

Methods for the analysis of RNA-Seq and related sequence census based experimentsR01HG006129 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI PACHTER, LIOR S · 2011 to 2013
$1.1M
NHGRI NIH HHS HG006129
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProbabilistic assignment of ambiguously mapped fragments produced by high-throughput sequencing experiments has been demonstrated to greatly improve accuracy in the analysis of RNA-Seq and ChIP-Seq, and is an essential step in many other sequence census experiments. A maximum likelihood method using the expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm for optimization is commonly used to solve this problem. However, batch EM-based approaches do not scale well with the size of sequencing datasets, which have been increasing dramatically over the past few years. Thus, current approaches to fragment assignment rely on heuristics or approximations for tractability.

resultsWe present an implementation of a distributed EM solution to the fragment assignment problem using Spark, a data analytics framework that can scale by leveraging compute clusters within datacenters-"the cloud". We demonstrate that our implementation easily scales to billions of sequenced fragments, while providing the exact maximum likelihood assignment of ambiguous fragments. The accuracy of the method is shown to be an improvement over the most widely used tools available and can be run in a constant amount of time when cluster resources are scaled linearly with the amount of input data.

conclusionsThe cloud offers one solution for the difficulties faced in the analysis of massive high-thoughput sequencing data, which continue to grow rapidly. Researchers in bioinformatics must follow developments in distributed systems-such as new frameworks like Spark-for ways to port existing methods to the cloud and help them scale to the datasets of the future. Our software, eXpress-D, is freely available at: http://github.com/adarob/express-d.

Indexed as

SoftwareAlgorithmsArtificial IntelligenceComputational BiologyComputer Communication NetworksFeasibility StudiesHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansLikelihood FunctionsOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisPeptide FragmentsProbabilityProgramming LanguagesSearch EngineSequence AlignmentTranscriptomePeptide Fragments

Identifiers

PMID24314033
PMCPMC3881492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.