Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24313971›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2013

Sex differences in circumstances and consequences of outdoor and indoor falls in older adults in the MOBILIZE Boston cohort study.

Rachel L Duckham, Elizabeth Procter-Gray, Marian T Hannan, Suzanne G Leveille, Lewis A Lipsitz, Wenjun Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Baseline health-related quality of life predicts falls: a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2022
    Trial
  4. Falls Risk in Relation to Activity Exposure in High-Risk Older Adults.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2020
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Degree of Trauma Differs for Major Osteoporotic Fracture Events in Older Men Versus Older Women.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2016
    Trial
  7. Circumstances of fall-related fracture events among men in late life.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Impact of coexisting lumbar spinal stenosis and sleep disorders on fall risk: a cross-sectional study of community-dwelling residents (locomotive syndrome and health outcome in Aizu cohort study).European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Sex differences in fall circumstances and injury biomechanics among older adults: A narrative review.Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine · 2026
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rachel L Duckham
Elizabeth Procter-Gray
Marian T Hannan
Suzanne G Leveille
Lewis A Lipsitz
Wenjun LiHealth Statistics and Geography Lab, Division of Preventive and Behavioral Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Shaw SH2-230, 55 Lake Avenue North, Worcester, MA, USA. Wenjun.Li@umassmed.edu.

Funding

VITAMIN D NUTRITION IN THE INSTITUTIONALIZED ELDERLYP01AG004390 · NIA · HEBREW REHABILITATION CENTER FOR AGED · PI COLLINS, JAMES J · 1985 to 2008
$13.2M
Attention Demands of Chronic Pain and Risk for Falls in Older AdultsR01AG041525 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS BOSTON · PI LEVEILLE, SUZANNE G. · 2011 to 2015
$3.0M
Foot Disorders and Falls in a Population-Based CohortR01AG026316 · NIA · HEBREW REHABILITATION CENTER FOR AGED · PI HANNAN, MARIAN T. · 2005 to 2009
$1.6M
Nonlinear Dynamics of Frailty in AgingR37AG025037 · NIA · HEBREW REHABILITATION CENTER FOR AGED · PI LIPSITZ, LEWIS · 2006 to 2013
$1.6M
Neighborhood Risk Factors for Falls in the ElderlyR01AG028738 · NIA · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI LI, WENJUN · 2008 to 2011
$1.4M
NIA NIH HHS 5P01AG004390NIA NIH HHS 5R01AG026316NIA NIH HHS 5R01AG028738NIA NIH HHS 5R37AG025037NIA NIH HHS R01 AG041525
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite extensive research on risk factors associated with falling in older adults, and current fall prevention interventions focusing on modifiable risk factors, there is a lack of detailed accounts of sex differences in risk factors, circumstances and consequences of falls in the literature. We examined the circumstances, consequences and resulting injuries of indoor and outdoor falls according to sex in a population study of older adults.

methodsMen and women 65 years and older (N = 743) were followed for fall events from the Maintenance of Balance, Independent Living, Intellect, and Zest in the Elderly (MOBILIZE) Boston prospective cohort study. Baseline measurements were collected by comprehensive clinical assessments, home visits and questionnaires. During the follow-up (median = 2.9 years), participants recorded daily fall occurrences on a monthly calendar, and fall circumstances were determined by a telephone interview. Falls were categorized by activity and place of falling. Circumstance-specific annualized fall rates were calculated and compared between men and women using negative binomial regression models.

resultsWomen had lower rates of outdoor falls overall (Crude Rate Ratio (RR): 0.72, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.56-0.92), in locations of recreation (RR: 0.34, 95% CI: 0.17-0.70), during vigorous activity (RR: 0.38, 95% CI: 0.18-0.81) and on snowy or icy surfaces (RR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.36-0.86) compared to men. Women and men did not differ significantly in their rates of falls outdoors on sidewalks, streets, and curbs, and during walking. Compared to men, women had greater fall rates in the kitchen (RR: 1.88, 95% CI: 1.04-3.40) and while performing household activities (RR: 3.68, 95% CI: 1.50-8.98). The injurious outdoor fall rates were equivalent in both sexes. Women's overall rate of injurious indoor falls was nearly twice that of men's (RR: 1.98, 95% CI: 1.44-2.72), especially in the kitchen (RR: 6.83, 95% CI: 2.05-22.79), their own home (RR: 1.84, 95% CI: 1.30-2.59) and another residential home (RR: 4.65, 95% CI: 1.05-20.66) or other buildings (RR: 2.29, 95% CI: 1.18-4.44).

conclusionsSignificant sex differences exist in the circumstances and injury potential when older adults fall indoors and outdoors, highlighting a need for focused prevention strategies for men and women.

Indexed as

EnvironmentSex CharacteristicsAccidental FallsActivities of Daily LivingAgedAged, 80 and overBostonCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID24313971
PMCPMC3907046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.