Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24312729›Full record

ArticleInterface focus2012

Using field data to test locust migratory band collective movement models.

J Buhl, Gregory A Sword, Stephen J Simpson

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Interface focus, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Non-local interactions in collective motion.Royal Society open science · 2021
    Article
  8. Detection and characterization of chemotaxis without cell tracking.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Collective movement in ecology: from emerging technologies to conservation and management.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Article
  13. Understanding how animal groups achieve coordinated movement.The Journal of experimental biology · 2016
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Locust Collective Motion and Its Modeling.PLoS computational biology · 2015
    Review
  16. Intermittent collective dynamics emerge from conflicting imperatives in sheep herds.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

J BuhlSchool of Biological Sciences, Heydon-Laurence Building, A08, and the Charles Perkins Centre , The University of Sydney , New South Wales 2006 , Australia.
Gregory A Sword
Stephen J Simpson
University of Sydney · AUTexas A&M University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wingless locust nymphs can form massive migratory groups known as bands, whose coordinated movement results from local interactions. We analysed the spatial distribution of locusts within naturally occurring bands and compared them with computer simulations to infer which interaction rules are used by individuals. We found that the empirical radial distribution of neighbours around a focal individual was isotropic, indicating a tendency for locusts to interact with neighbours all around them, rather than a bias towards pursuing individuals ahead or escaping from the ones following behind. By using maps of neighbour densities and pair correlation functions, we found evidence for a short-range repulsion force, balanced by a clustering force, presumably alignment and/or attraction, at a distance of around 3 cm. These results were similar to those observed when using a 'zonal' self-propelled particles model where repulsion/alignment/attraction forces are delimited by concentric circular zones of set radii. However, the profiles obtained either by using different combinations of forces, limiting the number of neighbours involved in interactions, or by varying the range of some zones, all appeared to produce similar results, thereby limiting the ability to more precisely determine the rules underlying locust interactions.

Indexed as

collective movementlocustsself-propelled particles

Identifiers

PMID24312729
PMCPMC3499121
OpenAlexW2164310525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.