Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24312659›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

A probabilistic model for reducing medication errors.

Phung Anh Nguyen, Shabbir Syed-Abdul, Usman Iqbal, Min-Huei Hsu, Chen-Ling Huang, Hsien-Chang Li, Daniel Livius Clinciu, Wen-Shan Jian, Yu-Chuan Jack Li

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07590271 (Research on the Whole Process of AI Intelligent Management System for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07590271 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Research on the Whole Process of AI Intelligent Management System for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

TypeobservationalSponsorTaichung Veterans General HospitalRan2026 to 2027Enrolled4,500ConditionsInflammatory Bowel Disease (Crohn&#39, s Disease and Ulcerative Colitis), Crohn's Disease (CD), Ulcerative Colitis (UC)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Phung Anh NguyenInstitute of Biomedical Informatics, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan ; College of Medicine Science and Technology, Graduate Institute of Biomedical Informatics, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Shabbir Syed-Abdul
Usman Iqbal
Min-Huei Hsu
Chen-Ling Huang
Hsien-Chang Li
Daniel Livius Clinciu
Wen-Shan Jian
Yu-Chuan Jack Li
Taipei Medical University · TWNational Yang Ming Chiao Tung University · TWMinistry of Health and Welfare · TWWan Fang Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMedication errors are common, life threatening, costly but preventable. Information technology and automated systems are highly efficient for preventing medication errors and therefore widely employed in hospital settings. The aim of this study was to construct a probabilistic model that can reduce medication errors by identifying uncommon or rare associations between medications and diseases. METHODS AND

findingsAssociation rules of mining techniques are utilized for 103.5 million prescriptions from Taiwan's National Health Insurance database. The dataset included 204.5 million diagnoses with ICD9-CM codes and 347.7 million medications by using ATC codes. Disease-Medication (DM) and Medication-Medication (MM) associations were computed by their co-occurrence and associations' strength were measured by the interestingness or lift values which were being referred as Q values. The DMQs and MMQs were used to develop the AOP model to predict the appropriateness of a given prescription. Validation of this model was done by comparing the results of evaluation performed by the AOP model and verified by human experts. The results showed 96% accuracy for appropriate and 45% accuracy for inappropriate prescriptions, with a sensitivity and specificity of 75.9% and 89.5%, respectively.

conclusionsWe successfully developed the AOP model as an efficient tool for automatic identification of uncommon or rare associations between disease-medication and medication-medication in prescriptions. The AOP model helps to reduce medication errors by alerting physicians, improving the patients' safety and the overall quality of care.

Indexed as

Medication ErrorsModels, Statistical

Identifiers

PMID24312659
PMCPMC3849453
OpenAlexW2045345984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.