ArticlePloS one2013
Testing the reproducibility of multiple displacement amplification on genomes of clonal endosymbiont populations.
Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Conservation of Genomic Information in Multiple Displacement Amplified Low-Quantity Metagenomic Material from Marine Invertebrates.Marine drugs · 2023Article
- Dissecting the dominant hot spring microbial populations based on community-wide sampling at single-cell genomic resolution.The ISME journal · 2022Article
- Genome sequencing and de novo assembly of the giant unicellular alga Acetabularia acetabulum using droplet MDA.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Article
- Deep Impact of Random Amplification and Library Construction Methods on Viral Metagenomics Results.Viruses · 2021Article
- Disjunction between canola distribution and the genetic structure of its recently described pest, the canola flower midge (Ecology and evolution · 2020Article
- A new method for long-read sequencing of animal mitochondrial genomes: application to the identification of equine mitochondrial DNA variants.BMC genomics · 2020Article
- Whole-genome sequencing of dog-specific assemblages C and D ofMicrobial genomics · 2019Article
- Evaluation of bias induced by viral enrichment and random amplification protocols in metagenomic surveys of saliva DNA viruses.Microbiome · 2018Article
- The first complete genome sequences of the acI lineage, the most abundant freshwater Actinobacteria, obtained by whole-genome-amplification of dilution-to-extinction cultures.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Comparative Genomics of Two Closely Related Wolbachia with Different Reproductive Effects on Hosts.Genome biology and evolution · 2016Article
- Quantitative assessment of single-cell whole genome amplification methods for detecting copy number variation using hippocampal neurons.Scientific reports · 2015Article
- Evaluation of methods to purify virus-like particles for metagenomic sequencing of intestinal viromes.BMC genomics · 2015Article
- Monodisperse Picoliter Droplets for Low-Bias and Contamination-Free Reactions in Single-Cell Whole Genome Amplification.PloS one · 2015Article
- Single cell genome analysis of an uncultured heterotrophic stramenopile.Scientific reports · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The multiple displacement amplification method has revolutionized genomic studies of uncultured bacteria, where the extraction of pure DNA in sufficient quantity for next-generation sequencing is challenging. However, the method is problematic in that it amplifies the target DNA unevenly, induces the formation of chimeric reads and also amplifies contaminating DNA. Here, we have tested the reproducibility of the multiple displacement amplification method using serial dilutions of extracted genomic DNA and intact cells from the cultured endosymbiont Bartonella australis. The amplified DNA was sequenced with the Illumina sequencing technology, and the results were compared to sequence data obtained from unamplified DNA in this study as well as from a previously published genome project. We show that artifacts such as the extent of the amplification bias, the percentage of chimeric reads and the relative fraction of contaminating DNA increase dramatically for the smallest amounts of template DNA. The pattern of read coverage was reproducibly obtained for samples with higher amounts of template DNA, suggesting that the bias is non-random and genome-specific. A re-analysis of previously published sequence data obtained after amplification from clonal endosymbiont populations confirmed these predictions. We conclude that many of the artifacts associated with the use of the multiple displacement amplification method can be alleviated or much reduced by using multiple cells as the template for the amplification. These findings should be particularly useful for researchers studying the genomes of endosymbionts and other uncultured bacteria, for which a small clonal population of cells can be isolated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.