ArticlePloS one2013
DNA barcode identification of Podocarpaceae--the second largest conifer family.
Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- DNA Barcoding Provides Taxonomic Clues for Identifying Five EndangeredPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
- Diversity, Distribution, Systematics and Conservation Status of Podocarpaceae.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Article
- Naturally Occurring 8ß,13ß-kaur-15-en-17-al and Anti-Malarial Activity fromPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Assessment of ITS2 Region Relevance for Taxa Discrimination and Phylogenetic Inference among Pinaceae.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- A Concise Review ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Anticancer Activities and Mechanism of Action of Nagilactones, a Group of Terpenoid Lactones Isolated from Podocarpus Species.Natural products and bioprospecting · 2020Review
- Seed Total Protein Profiling in Discrimination of Closely Related Pines: Evidence from thePlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Diversity and evolution of leaf anatomical characters in Taxaceae s.l.-fluorescence microscopy reveals new delimitating characters.Journal of plant research · 2018Article
- Article
- The first initiative of DNA barcoding of ornamental plants from Egypt and potential applications in horticulture industry.PloS one · 2017Article
- Article
- ycf1, the most promising plastid DNA barcode of land plants.Scientific reports · 2015Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We have generated matK, rbcL, and nrITS2 DNA barcodes for 320 specimens representing all 18 extant genera of the conifer family Podocarpaceae. The sample includes 145 of the 198 recognized species. Comparative analyses of sequence quality and species discrimination were conducted on the 159 individuals from which all three markers were recovered (representing 15 genera and 97 species). The vast majority of sequences were of high quality (B 30 = 0.596-0.989). Even the lowest quality sequences exceeded the minimum requirements of the BARCODE data standard. In the few instances that low quality sequences were generated, the responsible mechanism could not be discerned. There were no statistically significant differences in the discriminatory power of markers or marker combinations (p = 0.05). The discriminatory power of the barcode markers individually and in combination is low (56.7% of species at maximum). In some instances, species discrimination failed in spite of ostensibly useful variation being present (genotypes were shared among species), but in many cases there was simply an absence of sequence variation. Barcode gaps (maximum intraspecific p-distance > minimum interspecific p-distance) were observed in 50.5% of species when all three markers were considered simultaneously. The presence of a barcode gap was not predictive of discrimination success (p = 0.02) and there was no statistically significant difference in the frequency of barcode gaps among markers (p = 0.05). In addition, there was no correlation between number of individuals sampled per species and the presence of a barcode gap (p = 0.27).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.