Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24312117›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2013

Genome-wide multi-omics profiling of colorectal cancer identifies immune determinants strongly associated with relapse.

Subha Madhavan, Yuriy Gusev, Thanemozhi G Natarajan, Lei Song, Krithika Bhuvaneshwar, Robinder Gauba, Abhishek Pandey, Bassem R Haddad, David Goerlitz, Amrita K Cheema and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Precision Medicine for Personalized Cancer Therapy.International journal of biological sciences · 2015
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA): an immeasurable source of knowledge.Contemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland) · 2015
    Review
  18. Effects of negative stressors on DNA methylation in the brain: implications for mood and anxiety disorders.American journal of medical genetics. Part B, Neuropsychiatric genetics : the official publication of the International Society of Psychiatric Genetics · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Subha MadhavanDepartment of Oncology, Innovation Center for Biomedical Informatics, Georgetown University Medical Center Washington, DC, USA ; Department of Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center Washington DC, USA.
Yuriy Gusev
Thanemozhi G Natarajan
Lei Song
Krithika Bhuvaneshwar
Robinder Gauba
Abhishek Pandey
Bassem R Haddad
David Goerlitz
Amrita K Cheema
Hartmut Juhl
Bhaskar Kallakury
John L Marshall
Stephen W Byers
Louis M Weiner

Funding

Georgetown-Howard Universities Center for Clinical and Translational Science (GHUUL1TR000101 · NCATS · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI MELLMAN, THOMAS A, VERBALIS, JOSEPH G · 2012 to 2015
$19.3M
Novel Targets in Endocrine ResponsivenessU54CA149147 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI MADHAVAN, SUBHA · 2010 to 2014
$6.9M
Targeting CDK4 in TGS-B Inactivated Gastrointestinal CancersP01CA130821 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI MISHRA, LOPA · 2008 to 2013
$6.9M
TARGETED IMMUNOTHERAPY USING BISPECIFIC ANTIBODIESR01CA050633 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI WEINER, LOUIS M. · 1989 to 2018
$6.5M
Beta-catenin-specific regulation of the vitamin D pathway in colon cancerR01CA129813 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI BYERS, STEPHEN W · 2008 to 2012
$1.6M
MACE2K - Molecular And Clinical Extraction: A Natural Language Processing Tool for Personalized MedicineU01HG008390 · NHGRI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI MADHAVAN, SUBHA · 2015 to 2017
$1.5M
CCR NIH HHS HHSN261200800001CNCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000101NCI NIH HHS HHSN261200800001ENCI NIH HHS P01 CA130821NCI NIH HHS R01 CA050633NCI NIH HHS R01 CA129813NCI NIH HHS U54 CA149147NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG008390
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use and benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy to treat stage II colorectal cancer (CRC) patients is not well understood since the majority of these patients are cured by surgery alone. Identification of biological markers of relapse is a critical challenge to effectively target treatments to the ~20% of patients destined to relapse. We have integrated molecular profiling results of several "omics" data types to determine the most reliable prognostic biomarkers for relapse in CRC using data from 40 stage I and II CRC patients. We identified 31 multi-omics features that highly correlate with relapse. The data types were integrated using multi-step analytical approach with consecutive elimination of redundant molecular features. For each data type a systems biology analysis was performed to identify pathways biological processes and disease categories most affected in relapse. The biomarkers detected in tumors urine and blood of patients indicated a strong association with immune processes including aberrant regulation of T-cell and B-cell activation that could lead to overall differences in lymphocyte recruitment for tumor infiltration and markers indicating likelihood of future relapse. The immune response was the biologically most coherent signature that emerged from our analyses among several other biological processes and corroborates other studies showing a strong immune response in patients less likely to relapse.

Indexed as

colorectal cancerexome sequencingimmune responseintegrative analysismulti-omicsrelapsesystems biologyvariant analysis

Identifiers

PMID24312117
PMCPMC3834519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.