Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24312014›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cellular neuroscience2013

Introduction and perspective, historical note.

Geoffrey Burnstock

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cellular neuroscience, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Purinergic Signaling in Spermatogenesis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2022
    Review
  6. Review
  7. The P2X7 purinergic receptor: a potential therapeutic target for lung cancer.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2020
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Neuronal P2X7 Receptors Revisited: Do They Really Exist?The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2017
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Purinergic signaling in testes revealed.The Journal of general physiology · 2016
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Conductance of P2X4 purinergic receptor is determined by conformational equilibrium in the transmembrane region.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Geoffrey BurnstockAutonomic Neuroscience Centre, University College Medical School London, UK ; Department of Pharmacology, The University of Melbourne Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

P2 nucleotide receptors were proposed to consist of two subfamilies based on pharmacology in 1985, named P2X and P2Y receptors. Later, this was confirmed following cloning of the receptors for nucleotides and studies of transduction mechanisms in the early 1990s. P2X receptors are ion channels and seven subtypes are recognized that form trimeric homomultimers or heteromultimers. P2X receptors are involved in neuromuscular and synaptic neurotransmission and neuromodulation. They are also expressed on many types of non-neuronal cells to mediate smooth muscle contraction, secretion, and immune modulation. The emphasis in this review will be on the pathophysiology of P2X receptors and therapeutic potential of P2X receptor agonists and antagonists for neurodegenerative and inflammatory disorders, visceral and neuropathic pain, irritable bowel syndrome, diabetes, kidney failure, bladder incontinence and cancer, as well as disorders if the special senses, airways, skin, cardiovascular, and musculoskeletal systems.

Indexed as

bladderbraincancergutinflammationlungpainskin

Identifiers

PMID24312014
PMCPMC3836022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.