Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24311994›Full record

ArticleWeb semantics (Online)2013

How Ontologies are Made: Studying the Hidden Social Dynamics Behind Collaborative Ontology Engineering Projects.

Markus Strohmaier, Simon Walk, Jan Pöschko, Daniel Lamprecht, Tania Tudorache, Csongor Nyulas, Mark A Musen, Natalya F Noy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Web semantics (Online), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Markus StrohmaierKnowledge Management Institute, Graz University of Technology, Austria ; Stanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research, Stanford University, USA.
Simon Walk
Jan Pöschko
Daniel Lamprecht
Tania Tudorache
Csongor Nyulas
Mark A Musen
Natalya F Noy

Funding

Collaborative Development of Biomedical Ontologies and TerminologiesR01GM086587 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MUSEN, MARK A · 2009 to 2016
$4.1M
Protege: An Ontology-Development Platform for Biomedical ScientistsR01GM103316 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MUSEN, MARK A · 2013 to 2016
$2.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM086587NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM103316
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditionally, evaluation methods in the field of semantic technologies have focused on the end result of ontology engineering efforts, mainly, on evaluating ontologies and their corresponding qualities and characteristics. This focus has led to the development of a whole arsenal of ontology-evaluation techniques that investigate the quality of ontologies

Indexed as

change logsCollaborative ontology engineeringevaluation

Identifiers

PMID24311994
PMCPMC3845806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.