Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24311984›Full record

ReviewPLoS biology2013

A community of one: social cognition and auditory verbal hallucinations.

Vaughan Bell

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PLoS biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04481217 (The Mediating Role of Dissociative Symptoms and Early Maladaptive Schemas in the Relationship Between Childhood Trauma and Auditory Hallucinations in Schizophrenia), which is not on this map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04481217 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

The Mediating Role of Dissociative Symptoms and Early Maladaptive Schemas in the Relationship Between Childhood Trauma and Auditory Hallucinations in Schizophrenia

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, GrenobleRan2020 to 2023Enrolled350ConditionsSchizophreniaArmsSelf-questionnaires battery, Socio-demographic screening
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Hallucination, imagery, dreaming: reassembling stimulus-independent perceptions based on Edmund Parish's classic misperception framework.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Derationalizing Delusions.Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. AVATAR therapy: a promising new approach for persistent distressing voices.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Vaughan BellKing's College London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Auditory verbal hallucinations have attracted a great deal of scientific interest, but despite the fact that they are fundamentally a social experience-in essence, a form of hallucinated communication-current theories remain firmly rooted in an individualistic account and have largely avoided engagement with social cognition. Nevertheless, there is mounting evidence for the role of social cognitive and social neurocognitive processes in auditory verbal hallucinations, and, consequently, it is proposed that problems with the internalisation of social models may be key to the experience.

Indexed as

CognitionCommunicationHallucinationsHumansInterpersonal RelationsModels, PsychologicalSpeech

Identifiers

PMID24311984
PMCPMC3848915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.