Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24311643›Full record

Trial reportNeuro-oncology2014

Phase II study of everolimus in children and adults with neurofibromatosis type 2 and progressive vestibular schwannomas.

Matthias A Karajannis, Geneviève Legault, Mari Hagiwara, Filippo G Giancotti, Alexander Filatov, Anna Derman, Tsivia Hochman, Judith D Goldberg, Emilio Vega, Jeffrey H Wisoff and 4 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neuro-oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 123 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Matthias A KarajannisCorresponding author: Matthias A. Karajannis, MD, MS, NYU Langone Medical Center, Hassenfeld Children's Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders, 160 East 32nd Street, 2nd floor, New York, NY 10016. matthias.karajannis@nyumc.org.
Geneviève Legault
Mari Hagiwara
Filippo G Giancotti
Alexander Filatov
Anna Derman
Tsivia Hochman
Judith D Goldberg
Emilio Vega
Jeffrey H Wisoff
John G Golfinos
Amanda Merkelson
J Thomas Roland
Jeffrey C Allen
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USNYU Langone Health · US

Funding

Vaccine FacilityP30CA016087 · NCI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI ADRIANA HEGUY · 1985 to 2026
$83.1M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundActivation of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling pathway is thought to be a key driver of tumor growth in Merlin (NF2)-deficient tumors. Everolimus is an oral inhibitor of mTOR complex 1 (mTORC1) with antitumor activity in a variety of cancers.

methodsWe conducted a single-institution, prospective, 2-stage, open-label phase II study to estimate the response rate to everolimus in neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) patients with progressive vestibular schwannoma (VS). Ten eligible patients were enrolled, including 2 pediatric patients. Everolimus was administered at a daily dose of 10 mg (adults) or 5 mg/m(2)/day (children <18 y) orally in continuous 28-day courses, for up to 12 courses. Response was assessed every 3 months with MRI, using 3-dimensional volumetric tumor analysis, and audiograms. Nine patients were evaluable for the primary response, defined as ≥15% decrease in VS volume. Hearing response was evaluable as a secondary endpoint in 8 patients.

resultsNone of the 9 patients with evaluable disease experienced a clinical or MRI response. No objective imaging or hearing responses were observed in stage 1 of the trial, and the study was closed according to predefined stopping rules.

conclusionEverolimus is ineffective for the treatment of progressive VS in NF2 patients. We are currently conducting a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic ("phase 0") study of everolimus in presurgical VS patients to elucidate the biological basis for apparent treatment resistance to mTORC1 inhibition in these tumors.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAntineoplastic AgentsChildDisease ProgressionEverolimusFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeoplasm StagingNeurofibromatosis 2Neuroma, AcousticPrognosisProspective StudiesAntineoplastic AgentsEverolimusSirolimuseverolimusmammalian target of rapamycinneurofibromatosis type 2phase II trialvestibular schwannoma.

Identifiers

PMID24311643
PMCPMC3895376
OpenAlexW2152578884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.