ArticleNeuro-oncology2014
Assessment of prognostic scores in brain metastases from breast cancer.
Article in Neuro-oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- RET receptor tyrosine kinase promotes breast cancer metastasis to the brain and RET inhibitors pralsetinib and selpercatinib suppress breast cancer brain metastases.Cell death & disease · 2026Article
- Prediction of Short and Long Survival after Surgery for Breast Cancer Brain Metastases.Cancers · 2022Article
- Article
- Article
- NCCBM, a Nomogram Prognostic Model in Breast Cancer Patients With Brain Metastasis.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- Review
- The prognostic factors influencing overall survival in uterine cervical cancer with brain metastasis.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2019Article
- A nomogram for predicting survival in patients with breast cancer brain metastasis.Oncology letters · 2018Article
- Management of breast cancer brain metastases: Focus on human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer.Chronic diseases and translational medicine · 2017Review
- Comparison of nine prognostic scores in patients with brain metastases of breast cancer receiving radiotherapy of the brain.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2016Article
- Practical consensus recommendations on Her2 +ve breast cancer with solitary brain mets.South Asian journal of cancerArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBreast cancer (BC) is the second most common cause of brain metastases (BM). Optimal management of BM from BC is still debated. In an attempt to provide appropriate treatment and to assist with optimal patient selection, several specific prognostic classifications for BM from BC have been established. We evaluated the prognostic value and validity of the 6 proposed scoring systems in an independent population of BC patients with BM.
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed all consecutive BC patients referred to our institution for newly diagnosed BM between October 1995 and July 2011 (n = 149). Each of the 6 scores proposed for BM from BC (Sperduto, Niwinska, Park, Nieder, Le Scodan, and Claude) was applied to this population. The discriminative ability of each score was assessed using the Brier score and the C-index. Individual prognostic values of clinical and histological factors were analyzed using uni- and multivariate analyses.
resultsMedian overall survival was 15.1 months (95% CI,11.5-18.7). Sperduto-GPA (P < .001), Nieder (P < .001), Park (P < .001), Claude (P < .001), Niwinska (P < .001), and Le Scodan (P = .034) scores all showed significant prognostic value. The Nieder score showed the best discriminative ability (C-index, 0.672; Brier score error reduction, 16.1%).
conclusionThe majority of prognostic scores were relevant for patients with BM from BC in our independent population, and the Nieder score seems to present the best predictive value but showed a relatively low positive predictive value. Thus, these results remain insufficient and challenge the routine use of these scoring systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.