Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24311636›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology2014

Response of primary glioblastoma cells to therapy is patient specific and independent of cancer stem cell phenotype.

Shaun D Fouse, Jean L Nakamura, C David James, Susan Chang, Joseph F Costello

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The clinicopathological significance of CD133 and Sox2 in astrocytic glioma.Cancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Brain Tumor Stem Cells Remain in Play.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2017
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shaun D FouseDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Brain Tumor Research Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California (S.D.F., C.D.J., S.C., J.F.C); Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, California (J.L.N.).
Jean L Nakamura
C David James
Susan Chang
Joseph F Costello
University of California, San Francisco · USNeurological Surgery · US

Funding

Project 4: Multi-modality Metabolic Imaging for Monitoring Molecular Sub-types of GliomaP01CA118816 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Joanna Phillips · 2007 to 2026
$44.7M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA118816NCI NIH HHS T32 CA108462-07
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlioblastoma multiforme (GBM) contains a population of cells that exhibit stem cell phenotypes. These cancer stem cells (CSCs) may be a source of therapeutic resistance, although support for this important concept is limited.

methodsWe determined whether early-passage GBM CSCs respond differently than patient-matched, genotypically similar non-CSCs to clinically relevant single or serial doses of temozolomide (TMZ), radiation therapy (XRT), or alternating TMZ treatment and XRT, which is the standard of care for GBM patients.

resultsDespite the phenotypic differences, including the presence of stem cell markers and formation of intracranial tumors, the CSCs and matched non-CSCs were equally resistant to TMZ in a majority of patients, using 2 independent assays. TMZ response was consistent with methylated O(6)-DNA methylguanine-methyltransferase (MGMT) and MGMT protein levels in both culture types. In contrast, CSCs were unexpectedly more responsive to XRT compared with matched non-CSCs from 2 patients despite having relatively equal resistance to TMZ. However, for the majority of culture pairs from individual patients, responses in CSCs were indistinguishable from non-CSC cultures.

conclusionsIn our patient-matched primary cultures, response to TMZ was tightly linked to the individual tumor's MGMT status and independent of their phenotypic differences. TMZ and XRT together revealed no additive benefit compared with monotherapy for either culture type, in contrast to the notion that the CSC population is more resistant to XRT. If the tumor cell response in vitro mirrors therapeutic response in larger patient cohorts, these rapid assays in primary cultures could allow -empirical selection of efficacious therapeutic agents on a patient-specific basis.

Indexed as

AC133 AntigenAntigens, CDAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingBrain NeoplasmsCell SurvivalChemoradiotherapyDacarbazineGlioblastomaGlycoproteinsHumansNeoplastic Stem CellsPeptidesPhenotypeTemozolomideTumor Cells, CulturedAC133 AntigenAntigens, CDAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingDacarbazineGlycoproteinsPeptidesTemozolomidecancer stem cellglioblastoma multiformeradiation response

Identifiers

PMID24311636
PMCPMC3922516
OpenAlexW2164986212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.