Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24311403›Full record

Trial reportProgress in transplantation (Aliso Viejo, Calif.)2013

Randomized trial to evaluate nutritional status and absorption of enteral feeding after brain death.

Georgene W Hergenroeder, Norman H Ward, Xiaoying Yu, Antone Opekun, Anthony N Moore, Claudia A Kozinetz, David J Powner

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Progress in transplantation (Aliso Viejo, Calif.), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00858390 (Clinical Interventions to Increase Organ Procurement Nutritional Status and Enteral Absorption Capability After Brain Death), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00858390 nacompletednot on this map

Clinical Interventions to Increase Organ Procurement Nutritional Status and Enteral Absorption Capability After Brain Death (R38OT10585)

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe University of Texas Health Science Center, HoustonRan2009 to 2013Enrolled36ConditionsBrain DeathArmsenteral feeding with Oxepa® and Glutasolve®
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Variability in deceased donor care in Canada: a report of the Canada-DONATE cohort study.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2020
    Article
  5. Management of the Pediatric Organ Donor.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Georgene W HergenroederThe University of Texas at Houston Memorial Hermann Hospital-Texas Medical Center, Houston.
Norman H Ward
Xiaoying Yu
Antone Opekun
Anthony N Moore
Claudia A Kozinetz
David J Powner
Texas Medical Center · USMemorial Hermann · US

Funding

Tissue Analysis & Molecular Imaging CoreP30DK056338 · NIDDK · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI James Versalovic · 2001 to 2026
$28.3M
NIDDK NIH HHS DK056338NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK056338
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextCatecholamines and inflammatory mediators, with elevated levels after brain death, are associated with reduced function and survival of transplanted organs. Enteral nutrition reduces tissue damage and may benefit organs.

objectiveTo evaluate the effects of immunomodulating enteral nutrition in organ donors.

designProspective, randomized, open-label study.

settingIntensive care unit. PATIENTS: Thirty-six brain-dead organ donors.

interventionsDonors were randomized to receive enteral nutrition containing omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid, antioxidants, and glutamine or standard care (fasting). Donors received hormonal replacement therapy of corticosteroid, levothyroxine, dextrose, and insulin.

main outcome measuresGastrointestinal assimilation (measured by 13 carbon-labeled uracil breath analysis), quantity of organs recovered, resting energy expenditure, urine level of urea nitrogen, and serum levels of albumin, prealbumin, interleukin 6, tumor necrosis factor-α, and C-reactive protein were evaluated.

resultsThirteen patients (36%) assimilated 13C-labeled uracil. Resting energy expenditure was significantly higher than predicted between 10 and 14 hours after baseline in 33 donors (P= .007). Other measures were not conclusively different between fed and fasting groups. No adverse events occurred that were related to the enteral feeding.

conclusionsAbout 30% of donors metabolized 13C-labeled uracil, although no difference in oxidation rate was found between fasting and fed donors. Corticosteroid administration lowers plasma levels of interleukin 6 and most likely contributes to greater than predicted resting energy expenditure. Thus energy needs may not be met during fasting if hormones are given. Consequences of this possible energy deficit warrant further study.

Indexed as

Enteral NutritionImmunomodulationTissue and Organ HarvestingAdolescentAdultAgedBrain DeathEnergy MetabolismFemaleGraft SurvivalHumansInflammationIntestinal AbsorptionMaleMiddle AgedProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID24311403
PMCPMC3971639
OpenAlexW2089833342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.