Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24310926›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2015

Prospective evaluation of anatomic patellofemoral inlay resurfacing: clinical, radiographic, and sports-related results after 24 months.

Andreas B Imhoff, Matthias J Feucht, Gebhart Meidinger, Philip B Schöttle, Matthias Cotic

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. [Patellofemoral arthroplasty].Operative Orthopadie und Traumatologie · 2017
    Trial
  4. Review
  5. [Patellofemoral joint replacement: onlay or inlay?]Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Andreas B ImhoffDepartment for Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, Technical University Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany. a.imhoff@lrz.tum.de.
Matthias J FeuchtDepartment for Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, Technical University Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Gebhart MeidingerDepartment for Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, Technical University Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Philip B SchöttleDepartment for Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, Technical University Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Matthias CoticDepartment for Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, Technical University Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Institute for Sports Medicine · DETechnical University of Munich · DEKlinikum rechts der Isar · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo prospectively evaluate the clinical, radiographic, and sports-related outcomes at 24 months after isolated and combined patellofemoral inlay resurfacing (PFIR).

methodsBetween 2009 and 2010, 29 consecutive patients with patellofemoral osteoarthritis (OA) were treated with the HemiCAP(®) Wave Patellofemoral Resurfacing System (Arthrosurface, Franklin, MA, USA). Based on preoperative findings, patients were divided into two groups: group I, isolated PFIR (n = 20); and group II, combined PFIR with concomitant procedures to address patellofemoral instability, patellofemoral malalignment, and tibiofemoral malalignment (n = 9). Patients were evaluated preoperatively and at 24 months postoperatively. Clinical outcomes included WOMAC, subjective IKDC, Pain VAS, Tegner activity score, and a self-designed sports questionnaire. Kellgren-Lawrence grading was used to assess progression of tibiofemoral OA. The Caton-Deschamps Index was used to assess differences in patellar height.

resultsTwenty-seven patients (93 %) were available for 24-month follow-up. Eighty-one per cent of the patients were either satisfied or very satisfied with the overall outcome. Significant improvements in the WOMAC, subjective IKDC, and Pain VAS were seen in the overall patient cohort and in both subgroups. The median Tegner score and sports frequency showed a significant increase in the overall patient cohort and in group II. The number of sports disciplines increased significantly in both subgroups. No significant progression of tibiofemoral OA or changes in patellar height were observed.

conclusionPatellofemoral inlay resurfacing is an effective and safe procedure in patients with symptomatic patellofemoral OA. Significant improvements in functional scores and sports activity were found after both isolated and combined procedures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prospective case series, Level III.

Indexed as

SportsAdultDisease ProgressionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansKnee JointMaleMiddle AgedOsteoarthritis, KneePatellaPatellofemoral JointPostoperative PeriodProspective StudiesRadiographyReturn to Sport

Identifiers

PMID24310926
OpenAlexW2009172629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.