Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24310420›Full record

ArticleMedical microbiology and immunology2014

Performance of two MALDI-TOF MS systems for the identification of yeasts isolated from bloodstream infections and cerebrospinal fluids using a time-saving direct transfer protocol.

Axel Hamprecht, Sara Christ, Tanja Oestreicher, Georg Plum, Volkhard A J Kempf, Stephan Göttig

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Medical microbiology and immunology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. A case ofIDCases · 2024
    Article
  4. A side-by-side comparison of the new VITEK MS PRIME and the MALDI Biotyper sirius in the clinical microbiology laboratory.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2023
    Article
  5. Bloodstream Infections Caused byAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Current medical mycology · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Comparison and optimization of two MALDI-TOF MS platforms for the identification of medically relevant yeast species.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2014
    Article
  18. Update on fungal diagnostics.Current infectious disease reports · 2014
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Axel HamprechtInstitute for Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Hygiene, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany, axel.hamprecht@uk-koeln.de.
Sara Christ
Tanja Oestreicher
Georg Plum
Volkhard A J Kempf
Stephan Göttig

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid and correct identification of pathogens is of paramount importance for the treatment of patients with invasive infections. Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) can speed up the identification of bacteria and fungi and has quickly been embraced by medical microbiology laboratories worldwide. Different MALDI-TOF systems have been compared in studies focussing on identification rates of different pathogens. Another aspect that has not been systematically assessed is the performance in daily routine and handling, which is important especially for microbiology routine laboratories. We compared two widespread commercial systems, Microflex LT Biotyper (Bruker) and VitekMS (bioMérieux), for the identification of 210 relevant clinical yeasts under routine conditions, using a time-saving direct transfer protocol. We assessed the need for an additional extraction step, the threshold for species identification and the duration of measurements with the two systems. The tested yeasts included 34 Candida albicans isolates, 144 non-albicans Candida spp. and 32 yeasts of different genera. The results of the two MS systems were compared with that of biochemical identification and, in case of discrepancies, DNA sequencing of the internal transcribed spacer or the large subunit of ribosomal DNA. Both systems correctly identified 96.2 % of isolates [202/210, non-significant (n.s.)]. Misidentifications were observed for VitekMS only (n = 5, no major errors, n.s.). VitekMS was the slower system (19.8 vs. 8.0 min for 10 samples, p = 0.002) but had the advantage of a more effective direct transfer protocol with less need for an additional extraction step.

Indexed as

CandidaCandidiasisHumansSequence Analysis, DNASpectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-Ionization

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.