Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24309663›Full record

ReviewNature medicine2013

Key roles of adjuvants in modern vaccines.

Steven G Reed, Mark T Orr, Christopher B Fox

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04854876 (An Open-Label, Pilot Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of 5-ALA-Phosphate + SFC as an Immune System Enhancer Along With Vaccination Against SARS-CoV-2 Virus Infection), which is not on this map. Cited by 732 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
732citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04854876 nawithdrawnnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

An Open-Label, Pilot Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of 5-ALA-Phosphate + SFC as an Immune System Enhancer Along With Vaccination Against SARS-CoV-2 Virus Infection

TypeinterventionalSponsorRoyal College of Surgeons in Ireland - Medical University of BahrainRan2021 to 2021Enrolled0ConditionsSARS-COV 2, Covid19Arms5-ALA-Phosphate + SFC (5-ALA+SFC)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

732 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

672 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Steven G ReedInfectious Disease Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Mark T Orr
Christopher B Fox

Funding

PHS HHS HHSN272200800045C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccines containing novel adjuvant formulations are increasingly reaching advanced development and licensing stages, providing new tools to fill previously unmet clinical needs. However, many adjuvants fail during product development owing to factors such as manufacturability, stability, lack of effectiveness, unacceptable levels of tolerability or safety concerns. This Review outlines the potential benefits of adjuvants in current and future vaccines and describes the importance of formulation and mechanisms of action of adjuvants. Moreover, we emphasize safety considerations and other crucial aspects in the clinical development of effective adjuvants that will help facilitate effective next-generation vaccines against devastating infectious diseases.

Indexed as

Adjuvants, ImmunologicAnimalsHumansImmunity, CellularInfection ControlVaccinesAdjuvants, ImmunologicVaccines

Identifiers

PMID24309663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.