Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24309632›Full record

ArticleClinical oral investigations2014

Radiotherapy does not impair dentin adhesive properties in head and neck cancer patients.

Roberta Galetti, Alan Roger Santos-Silva, Alberto Nogueira da Gama Antunes, Fabio de Abreu Alves, Marcio Ajudarte Lopes, Mario Fernando de Goes

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Effectiveness of glass ionomer cements in the restorative treatment of radiation-related caries - a systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Preventive and restorative alternatives to caries by irradiation: a scoping review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. The impact of radiation caries in the quality of life of head and neck cancer patients.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Article
  10. Radiotherapy impairs adhesive bonding in permanent teeth.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Roberta GalettiDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas-UNICAMP, Limeira Avenue, 901-Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil, 13414-903, 52.
Alan Roger Santos-Silva
Alberto Nogueira da Gama Antunes
Fabio de Abreu Alves
Marcio Ajudarte Lopes
Mario Fernando de Goes

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study evaluated the influence of radiotherapy on the dentin bond strength of teeth extracted from patients who had undergone head and neck radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND

methodsA total of 36 samples were divided into two experimental groups: group I (control group, n = 18) and group II (in vivo irradiated group, n = 18). Groups I and II were further separated into three subgroups (six specimens per subgroup), which were further assigned to the three adhesive system protocols employed: Single Bond 2 (SB) (3M ESPE), Easy Bond (EB) (3M ESPE) and Clearfil SE Bond (CSE) (Kuraray). The adhesive systems were applied to the prepared surface according to the manufacturers' instructions and restored using composite resin (Filtek Supreme, 3M ESPE). After 24 h in deionised water (37(o)C), teeth were horizontally and vertically cut to obtain beam specimens with a cross-section area of 0.8 ± 1.0 mm(2). Specimens were tested in tension using a universal testing machine at a cross-speed of 0.5 mm/min. Fracture patterns were observed under SEM. Data was analysed by two-way analysis of variance (p ≤ 0.05).

resultsNo statistically significant difference was found between the irradiated (R/SB = 44.66 ± 10.12 MPa; R/EB = 41.48 ± 12.71 MPa; and R/CSE = 46.01 ± 6.98 MPa) and control group (C/SB = 39.12 ± 9.51 MPa; C/EB = 42.40 ± 6.66 MPa; and C/CSE = 36.58 ± 7.06 MPa) for any of the adhesive systems. All groups presented a predominance of mixed fracture modes.

conclusionHead and neck radiotherapy did not affect dentin bond strength for the adhesive materials tested in this study.

Indexed as

AdhesivenessBisphenol A-Glycidyl MethacrylateComposite ResinsDental Stress AnalysisDentin-Bonding AgentsHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansIn Vitro TechniquesMaterials TestingMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningResin CementsSurface PropertiesTensile StrengthTooth ExtractionBisphenol A-Glycidyl MethacrylateClearfil SE BondComposite ResinsDentin-Bonding Agentseasy bondResin Cementssingle bond

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.