Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24308800›Full record

ArticleMicrobial biotechnology2014

Diversity of epothilone producers among Sorangium strains in producer-positive soil habitats.

Shu-Guang Li, Lin Zhao, Kui Han, Peng-Fei Li, Zhi-Feng Li, Wei Hu, Hong Liu, Zhi-Hong Wu, Yue-Zhong Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial biotechnology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Shu-Guang LiState Key Laboratory of Microbial Technology, School of Life Science, Shandong University, Jinan, 250100, China.
Lin Zhao
Kui Han
Peng-Fei Li
Zhi-Feng Li
Wei Hu
Hong Liu
Zhi-Hong Wu
Yue-Zhong Li

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large-scale surveys show that the anti-tumour compounds known as epothilones are produced by only a small proportion of Sorangium strains, thereby greatly hampering the research and development of these valuable compounds. In this study, to investigate the niche diversity of epothilone-producing Sorangium strains, we re-surveyed four soil samples where epothilone producers were previously found. Compared with the < 2.5% positive strains collected from different places, epothilone producers comprised 25.0-75.0% of the Sorangium isolates in these four positive soil samples. These sympatric epothilone producers differed not only in their 16S rRNA gene sequences and morphologies but also in their production of epothilones and biosynthesis genes. A further exploration of 14 soil samples collected from a larger area around a positive site showed a similar high positive ratio of epothilone producers among the Sorangium isolates. The present results suggest that, in an area containing epothilone producers, the long-term genetic variations and refinements resulting from selective pressure form a large reservoir of epothilone-producing Sorangium strains with diverse genetic compositions.

Indexed as

Soil MicrobiologyAntineoplastic AgentsCluster AnalysisDNA, BacterialDNA, RibosomalEcosystemEpothilonesMetabolic Networks and PathwaysMolecular Sequence DataMyxococcalesPhylogenyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence Analysis, DNAAntineoplastic AgentsDNA, BacterialDNA, RibosomalEpothilonesRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID24308800
PMCPMC3937717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.