ArticleExpert review of medical devices2014
Challenges facing in vivo tracking of mesenchymal stem cells used for tissue regeneration.
Article in Expert review of medical devices, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dissecting the Pharmacodynamics and Pharmacokinetics of MSCs to Overcome Limitations in Their Clinical Translation.Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2019Review
- Noninvasive imaging of nanoparticle-labeled transplant populations within polymer matrices for neural cell therapy.Nanomedicine (London, England) · 2018Article
- The effect of two novel amino acid-coated magnetic nanoparticles on survival in vascular endothelial cells, bone marrow stromal cells, and macrophages.Nanoscale research letters · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are increasingly being investigated in the field of regenerative medicine. In vivo monitoring of MSCs can be performed with MRI, which is a non-invasive, non-toxic and clinically acceptable modality. In order to track these MSCs, cells must be labeled with detectable magnetic nanoparticles. However, they 'leak' from labeled cells, limiting their surveillance to a 3-week period. Li et al. developed a rodent model in order to evaluate MRI monitoring of intramuscularly injected aminopropyltriethoxysilane iron oxide-labeled MSCs. Both in vivo tracking and histological analysis were undertaken. Seeded MSCs demonstrated increased MRI signal in the labeled test group over 3 weeks compared with the unlabeled controls. Histological Prussian blue staining of posttermination tissues confirmed these findings. The authors conclude that successful labeling of MSCs is possible with aminopropyltriethoxysilane - magnetic nanoparticles and that these cells can be monitored in vivo. They offer this form of labeling as an alternative to more common dextran-coated magnetic nanoparticles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24308739What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.