Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24308739›Full record

ArticleExpert review of medical devices2014

Challenges facing in vivo tracking of mesenchymal stem cells used for tissue regeneration.

Mohammad A Hossain, Adam E Frampton, Atul Bagul

Abstract readComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Expert review of medical devices, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mohammad A HossainRenal Transplant and Vascular Access Department, St. George's Healthcare NHS Trust, Blackshaw Road, London SW17 0QT, UK.
Adam E Frampton
Atul Bagul

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are increasingly being investigated in the field of regenerative medicine. In vivo monitoring of MSCs can be performed with MRI, which is a non-invasive, non-toxic and clinically acceptable modality. In order to track these MSCs, cells must be labeled with detectable magnetic nanoparticles. However, they 'leak' from labeled cells, limiting their surveillance to a 3-week period. Li et al. developed a rodent model in order to evaluate MRI monitoring of intramuscularly injected aminopropyltriethoxysilane iron oxide-labeled MSCs. Both in vivo tracking and histological analysis were undertaken. Seeded MSCs demonstrated increased MRI signal in the labeled test group over 3 weeks compared with the unlabeled controls. Histological Prussian blue staining of posttermination tissues confirmed these findings. The authors conclude that successful labeling of MSCs is possible with aminopropyltriethoxysilane - magnetic nanoparticles and that these cells can be monitored in vivo. They offer this form of labeling as an alternative to more common dextran-coated magnetic nanoparticles.

Indexed as

Mesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationAnimalsCell TrackingHindlimbIschemiaMagnetic Resonance ImagingMagnetite NanoparticlesMaleMesenchymal Stem CellsMagnetite Nanoparticles

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.