Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24308583›Full record

ReviewExpert review of vaccines2014

Is administration of the HPV vaccine during pregnancy feasible in the future?

Abbey B Berenson, Pooja R Patel, Alan D Barrett

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Expert review of vaccines, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Abbey B BerensonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology and the Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Women's Health, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.
Pooja R Patel
Alan D Barrett

Funding

UTMB WOMEN'S HEALTH RESEARCH SCHOLARS PROGRAMK12HD052023 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BR GALVESTON · PI BERENSON, ABBEY B · 2005 to 2023
$8.1M
WOMEN'S REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH RESEARCH CENTERK12HD001269 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BR GALVESTON · PI HANKINS, GARY D · 1998 to 2013
$5.0M
Interdisciplinary Mentoring in Women's HealthK24HD043659 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BR GALVESTON · PI BERENSON, ABBEY B · 2003 to 2012
$1.5M
NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD001269NICHD NIH HHS K12HD001269NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD052023NICHD NIH HHS K12HD052023NICHD NIH HHS K24 HD043659NICHD NIH HHS K24HD043659
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the strong evidence supporting the efficacy of the HPV vaccine, the uptake rate remains low. One reason for this is that young females do not interact frequently with the healthcare system. In fact, pregnancy is often the first time young women experience multiple scheduled visits to a health provider. We review the data regarding safety of administering the HPV vaccine during pregnancy and consider the possibility of incorporating vaccination into prenatal care. Although the optimal time for vaccination is prior to sexual debut, this does not always occur, and as such, a broader approach to HPV vaccination may be necessary. Increasing the vaccine uptake rate among young women who did not initiate or complete the series earlier may significantly contribute to the decline in HPV-associated diseases.

Indexed as

FemaleHumansPapillomavirus InfectionsPapillomavirus VaccinesPregnancyUterine Cervical NeoplasmsVaccinationPapillomavirus Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID24308583
PMCPMC4103688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.