Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24307713›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of experimental biology2013

Maintaining acoustic communication at a cocktail party: heterospecific masking noise improves signal detection through frequency separation.

M E Siegert, H Römer, M Hartbauer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of experimental biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Neuronal processing of complex sounds in the prothoracic ganglion of a bushcricket.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Tonotopic CaJournal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2024
    Article
  4. Neurophysiology goes wild: from exploring sensory coding in sound proof rooms to natural environments.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2021
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Evolutionarily conserved coding properties favour the neuronal representation of heterospecific signals of a sympatric katydid species.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2018
    Article
  9. Listening in the bog: II. Neural correlates for acoustic interactions and spacing between Sphagniana sphagnorum males.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Male age and female mate choice in a synchronizing katydid.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2015
    Article
  14. Neural Mechanisms for Acoustic Signal Detection under Strong Masking in an Insect.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2015
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Ecology of acoustic signalling and the problem of masking interference in insects.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2015
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

M E SiegertInstitut für Zoologie, Karl-Franzens-Universität, Universitätsplatz 2, A-8010 Graz, Austria.
H Römer
M Hartbauer

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF P 21808Austrian Science Fund FWF P 23896
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We examined acoustic masking in a chirping katydid species of the Mecopoda elongata complex due to interference with a sympatric Mecopoda species where males produce continuous trills at high amplitudes. Frequency spectra of both calling songs range from 1 to 80 kHz; the chirper species has more energy in a narrow frequency band at 2 kHz and above 40 kHz. Behaviourally, chirper males successfully phase-locked their chirps to playbacks of conspecific chirps under masking conditions at signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) of -8 dB. After the 2 kHz band in the chirp had been equalised to the level in the masking trill, the breakdown of phase-locked synchrony occurred at a SNR of +7 dB. The remarkable receiver performance is partially mirrored in the selective response of a first-order auditory interneuron (TN1) to conspecific chirps under these masking conditions. However, the selective response is only maintained for a stimulus including the 2 kHz component, although this frequency band has no influence on the unmasked TN1 response. Remarkably, the addition of masking noise at 65 dB sound pressure level (SPL) to threshold response levels of TN1 for pure tones of 2 kHz enhanced the sensitivity of the response by 10 dB. Thus, the spectral dissimilarity between masker and signal at a rather low frequency appears to be of crucial importance for the ability of the chirping species to communicate under strong masking by the trilling species. We discuss the possible properties underlying the cellular/synaptic mechanisms of the 'novelty detector'.

Indexed as

Vocalization, AnimalAcousticsAnimalsAuditory PerceptionAuditory ThresholdFemaleGryllidaeMaleNoiseSignal-To-Noise Ratioambient noiseauditory interneuroninsectkatydidnovelty detectionselective encoding

Identifiers

PMID24307713
PMCPMC3971153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.