ArticleAnnals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine2014
Intention to undergo colonoscopy screening among relatives of colorectal cancer cases: a theory-based model.
Article in Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01274143 (Impact of Remote Familial Colorectal Cancer Assessment and Counseling), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Impact of Remote Familial Colorectal Cancer Assessment and Counseling
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multilevel factors influencing colorectal cancer screening adherence: A systematic literature review.PloS one · 2026Pooled it
- A Model-Based Meta-Analysis of Willingness to Participate in Cancer Screening.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Pooled it
- Do Subjective Norms Predict the Screening of Cancer Patients' First-Degree Relatives? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2020Pooled it
- Communicating risk to promote colorectal cancer screening: a multi-method study to test tailored versus targeted message strategies.Health education research · 2022Trial
- Intervention Mediators in a Randomized Controlled Trial to Increase Colonoscopy Uptake Among Individuals at Increased Risk of Familial Colorectal Cancer.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2017Trial
- Randomized trial to increase colorectal cancer screening in an ethnically diverse sample of first-degree relatives.Cancer · 2015Trial
- Predicting the Determinants of Colorectal Cancer Screening Behaviors Using Protection Motivation Theory: A Cross-Sectional Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling Analysis.Health science reports · 2025Article
- Understanding cancer genetic risk assessment motivations in a remote tailored risk communication and navigation intervention randomized controlled trial.Health psychology and behavioral medicine · 2022Article
- Cancer worry frequency vs. intensity and self-reported colorectal cancer screening uptake: A population-based study.Journal of medical screening · 2019Article
- Measurement invariance of intuitive cancer risk perceptions across diverse populations: The Cognitive Causation and Negative Affect in Risk scales.Journal of health psychology · 2019Article
- Creating an mHealth App for Colorectal Cancer Screening: User-Centered Design Approach.JMIR human factors · 2019Article
- Predictors of Response Outcomes for Research Recruitment Through a Central Cancer Registry: Evidence From 17 Recruitment Efforts for Population-Based Studies.American journal of epidemiology · 2019Article
- Examining intrafamilial communication of colorectal cancer risk status to family members and kin responses to colonoscopy: a qualitative study.Hereditary cancer in clinical practice · 2019Article
- Promoting guideline-based cancer genetic risk assessment for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer in ethnically and geographically diverse cancer survivors: Rationale and design of a 3-arm randomized controlled trial.Contemporary clinical trials · 2018Article
- Predictors of colorectal cancer screening intention among Iranian adults: an application of the preventive health model.Journal of preventive medicine and hygiene · 2018Article
- A cross-sectional survey assessing factors associated with reading cancer screening information: previous screening behaviour, demographics and decision-making style.BMC public health · 2017Article
- Cancer beliefs and patient activation in a diverse, multilingual primary care sample.Psycho-oncology · 2016Article
- Review
- Observational
- Effectiveness of the extended parallel process model in promoting colorectal cancer screening.Psycho-oncology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIt is recommended that persons having familial risk of colorectal cancer begin regular colonoscopy screening at an earlier age than those in the general population. However, many individuals at increased risk do not adhere to these screening recommendations. PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to examine cognitive, affective, social, and behavioral motivators of colonoscopy intention among individuals at increased risk of familial colorectal cancer.
methodsRelatives of colorectal cancer cases (N = 481) eligible for colonoscopy screening completed a survey assessing constructs from several theoretical frameworks including fear appeal theories.
resultsStructural equation modeling indicated that perceived colorectal cancer risk, past colonoscopy, fear of colorectal cancer, support from family and friends, and health-care provider recommendation were determinants of colonoscopy intention.
conclusionsFuture interventions to promote colonoscopy in this increased risk population should target the factors we identified as motivators. (ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT01274143).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.