Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24307138›Full record

ArticleCerebellum (London, England)2014

Consensus paper: pathological mechanisms underlying neurodegeneration in spinocerebellar ataxias.

A Matilla-Dueñas, T Ashizawa, A Brice, S Magri, K N McFarland, M Pandolfo, S M Pulst, O Riess, D C Rubinsztein, J Schmidt and 6 more

Abstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebellum (London, England), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 128 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 11 institutions in 7 countries.

A Matilla-DueñasHealth Sciences Research Institute Germans Trias i Pujol (IGTP), Ctra. de Can Ruti, Camí de les Escoles s/n, Badalona, Barcelona, Spain, amatilla@igtp.cat.
T Ashizawa
A Brice
S Magri
K N McFarland
M Pandolfo
S M Pulst
O Riess
D C Rubinsztein
J Schmidt
T Schmidt
D R Scoles
G Stevanin
F Taroni
B R Underwood
I Sánchez
University of Tübingen · DEFondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta · ITUniversity of Florida · USUniversity of Utah · USAddenbrooke's Hospital · GBAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRFulbourn Hospital · GBInstitut d'Investigació en Ciències de la Salut Germans Trias i Pujol · ESInstitut du Cerveau · FRUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESUniversité Libre de Bruxelles · BE

Funding

SPINOCEREBELLAR ATAXIA TYPE 2--GENE AND GENE PRODUCTR01NS033123 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI PULST, STEFAN M. · 1996 to 2012
$2.9M
RNA-Gain-of-Function Pathogenesis in SCA10R01NS083564 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI ASHIZAWA, TETSUO · 2013 to 2017
$1.7M
Drug Discovery for Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 2 (SCA2)RC4NS073009 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI PULST, STEFAN M., SCOLES, DANIEL R · 2010 to 2010
$835k
Medical Research Council MC_G1000734NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS033123NINDS NIH HHS R01NS033123NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS083564NINDS NIH HHS R01NS083564NINDS NIH HHS RC4 NS073009NINDS NIH HHS RC4NS073009Telethon GGP09301Wellcome Trust 095317Wellcome Trust 100140
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intensive scientific research devoted in the recent years to understand the molecular mechanisms or neurodegeneration in spinocerebellar ataxias (SCAs) are identifying new pathways and targets providing new insights and a better understanding of the molecular pathogenesis in these diseases. In this consensus manuscript, the authors discuss their current views on the identified molecular processes causing or modulating the neurodegenerative phenotype in spinocerebellar ataxias with the common opinion of translating the new knowledge acquired into candidate targets for therapy. The following topics are discussed: transcription dysregulation, protein aggregation, autophagy, ion channels, the role of mitochondria, RNA toxicity, modulators of neurodegeneration and current therapeutic approaches. Overall point of consensus includes the common vision of neurodegeneration in SCAs as a multifactorial, progressive and reversible process, at least in early stages. Specific points of consensus include the role of the dysregulation of protein folding, transcription, bioenergetics, calcium handling and eventual cell death with apoptotic features of neurons during SCA disease progression. Unresolved questions include how the dysregulation of these pathways triggers the onset of symptoms and mediates disease progression since this understanding may allow effective treatments of SCAs within the window of reversibility to prevent early neuronal damage. Common opinions also include the need for clinical detection of early neuronal dysfunction, for more basic research to decipher the early neurodegenerative process in SCAs in order to give rise to new concepts for treatment strategies and for the translation of the results to preclinical studies and, thereafter, in clinical practice.

Indexed as

AnimalsAutophagyHumansIon ChannelsMitochondriaNerve DegenerationRNASpinocerebellar AtaxiasTranscription, GeneticIon ChannelsRNA

Identifiers

PMID24307138
PMCPMC3943639
OpenAlexW2069927313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.