Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24306779›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry2014

"Best match" model and effect of Na+/H+ exchange on anion attachment to peptides and stability of formed adducts in negative ion electrospray mass spectrometry.

Xiaohua Liu, Richard B Cole

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xiaohua LiuDepartment of Chemistry, University of New Orleans, New Orleans, LA, 70148, USA.
Richard B Cole

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The "Best Match" model has been extended to account for the role that Na(+)/H(+) exchange plays on anion attachment in negative ion electrospray. Without any Na(+)/H(+) exchange on (Glu) fibrinopeptide B, the higher basicity anions F(-) and CH3COO(-) can hardly form observable adducts; however, after multiple Na(+)/H(+) exchanges, adduct formation is enabled. Moreover, dissociation pathways of CF3COO(-) adducts with singly deprotonated peptides that have undergone 0 to 3 Na(+)/H(+) exchanges exhibit a shift in CID product ions from losing predominately CF3COOH (case of 0 Na(+)/H(+) exchanges) to losing predominately CF3COO(-) (case of 3 Na(+)/H(+) exchanges). These phenomena can be rationalized by considering that Na(+) cations exchange at, and serve to "block", the most acidic sites, thereby forcing implicated anions to attach to lower acidity protons. In addition to forming ion pairs with carboxylate groups, Na(+) also participates in formation of tri-atomic ions of the form ANaA(-) during adduct dissociation. The fact that low gas-phase basicity (GB) anions preferentially form ANaA(-) species, even though high GB anions form more stable tri-atomic species, indicates that the monatomic ions were not in close contact in the initial adduct. The propensity for formation of stable anionic adducts is dependent on the degree of matching between anion GBs and GBapp of deprotonated sites on the peptide. The GBapp is raised dramatically as the charge state of the peptide increases via a through-space effect. The presence of Na(+) on carboxylate sites substantially decreases the GBapp by neutralizing these sites, while slightly increasing the intrinsic GBs by an inductive effect.

Indexed as

AnionsGasesPeptidesProtonsSodiumSpectrometry, Mass, Electrospray IonizationAnionsGasesPeptidesProtonsSodium

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.