Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24306534›Full record

ArticlePlant physiology2014

MAKER-P: a tool kit for the rapid creation, management, and quality control of plant genome annotations.

Michael S Campbell, MeiYee Law, Carson Holt, Joshua C Stein, Gaurav D Moghe, David E Hufnagel, Jikai Lei, Rujira Achawanantakun, Dian Jiao, Carolyn J Lawrence and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant physiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 272 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
272citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

272 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Evolutionary dynamics of the arthropod molting machinery.Molecular biology and evolution · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

212 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Michael S CampbellEccles Institute of Human Genetics , University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112.
MeiYee Law
Carson Holt
Joshua C Stein
Gaurav D Moghe
David E Hufnagel
Jikai Lei
Rujira Achawanantakun
Dian Jiao
Carolyn J Lawrence
Doreen Ware
Shin-Han Shiu
Kevin L Childs
Yanni Sun
Ning Jiang
Mark Yandell

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have optimized and extended the widely used annotation engine MAKER in order to better support plant genome annotation efforts. New features include better parallelization for large repeat-rich plant genomes, noncoding RNA annotation capabilities, and support for pseudogene identification. We have benchmarked the resulting software tool kit, MAKER-P, using the Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) and maize (Zea mays) genomes. Here, we demonstrate the ability of the MAKER-P tool kit to automatically update, extend, and revise the Arabidopsis annotations in light of newly available data and to annotate pseudogenes and noncoding RNAs absent from The Arabidopsis Informatics Resource 10 build. Our results demonstrate that MAKER-P can be used to manage and improve the annotations of even Arabidopsis, perhaps the best-annotated plant genome. We have also installed and benchmarked MAKER-P on the Texas Advanced Computing Center. We show that this public resource can de novo annotate the entire Arabidopsis and maize genomes in less than 3 h and produce annotations of comparable quality to those of the current The Arabidopsis Information Resource 10 and maize V2 annotation builds.

Indexed as

SoftwareAlternative SplicingArabidopsisComputational BiologyExonsGenes, PlantGenome, PlantMolecular Sequence AnnotationPseudogenesRepetitive Sequences, Nucleic AcidReproducibility of ResultsZea mays

Identifiers

PMID24306534
PMCPMC3912085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.