ReviewNeuropsychology review2013
Computerized neurocognitive testing in the management of sport-related concussion: an update.
Review in Neuropsychology review, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Psychometric Properties of Computerized Cognitive Tools and Standard Neuropsychological Tests Used to Assess Sport Concussion: A Systematic Review.Neuropsychology review · 2023Pooled it
- Considerations for Athletic Trainers: A Review of Guidance on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Among Children From the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the National Athletic Trainers' Association.Journal of athletic training · 2019Pooled it
- CogState computerized memory tests in patients with brain metastases: secondary endpoint results of NRG Oncology RTOG 0933.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2016Trial
- False-Positive Rates, Risk Factors, and Interpretations of the Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening in Collegiate Athletes.Journal of athletic training · 2024Article
- Computerized Cognitive Test Batteries for Children and Adolescents-A Scoping Review of Tools For Lab- and Web-Based Settings From 2000 to 2021.Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists · 2023Article
- The Clinical Utility of the Child SCAT5 for Acute Concussion Assessment.Sports medicine - open · 2022Article
- Neurocognitive Assessment Tools for Military Personnel With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: Scoping Literature Review.JMIR mental health · 2021Article
- Sensitivity and Specificity of Computer-Based Neurocognitive Tests in Sport-Related Concussion: Findings from the NCAA-DoD CARE Consortium.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2021Article
- Reaction times, learning, and executive functioning in adults born preterm.Pediatric research · 2021Article
- Accuracy of the SWAY Mobile Cognitive Assessment Application.International journal of sports physical therapy · 2021Article
- Acute Sport Concussion Assessment Optimization: A Prospective Assessment from the CARE Consortium.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2019Article
- Neuroimaging and Neuropsychological Studies in Sports-Related Concussions in Adolescents: Current State and Future Directions.Frontiers in neurology · 2019Review
- The Self-Efficacy of Certified Athletic Trainers in Assessing and Managing Sport-Related Concussions.Journal of athletic training · 2018Article
- Predicting Concussion Recovery in Children and Adolescents in the Emergency Department.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2018Review
- Prevalence of Invalid Performance on Baseline Testing for Sport-Related Concussion by Age and Validity Indicator.JAMA neurology · 2018Article
- Test-Retest Reliability and Interpretation of Common Concussion Assessment Tools: Findings from the NCAA-DoD CARE Consortium.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2018Article
- Using concurrent gait and cognitive assessments to identify impairments after concussion: a narrative review.Concussion (London, England) · 2018Review
- No Seasonal Changes in Cognitive Functioning Among High School Football Athletes: Implementation of a Novel Electrophysiological Measure and Standard Clinical Measures.Clinical journal of sport medicine : official journal of the Canadian Academy of Sport Medicine · 2018Observational
- A Retrospective Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Study of the Effects of Age on CNS Vital Signs Scores in High-School Athletes.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2017Article
- A review of the validity of computerized neurocognitive assessment tools in mild traumatic brain injury assessment.Concussion (London, England) · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Since the late nineties, computerized neurocognitive testing has become a central component of sport-related concussion (SRC) management at all levels of sport. In 2005, a review of the available evidence on the psychometric properties of four computerized neuropsychological test batteries concluded that the tests did not possess the necessary criteria to warrant clinical application. Since the publication of that review, several more computerized neurocognitive tests have entered the market place. The purpose of this review is to summarize the body of published studies on psychometric properties and clinical utility of computerized neurocognitive tests available for use in the assessment of SRC. A review of the literature from 2005 to 2013 was conducted to gather evidence of test-retest reliability and clinical validity of these instruments. Reviewed articles included both prospective and retrospective studies of primarily sport-based adult and pediatric samples. Summaries are provided regarding the available evidence of reliability and validity for the most commonly used computerized neurocognitive tests in sports settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24306287What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.