ArticleJournal of anesthesia2014
The lowest effective intracuff pressure of the esophagus obstruction tube to prevent reflux of gastric contents: a study on rabbits.
Article in Journal of anesthesia, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo determine the lowest effective cuff pressure of the esophageal obstruction tube to prevent reflux of gastric contents in rabbits.
methodsTwenty-two New Zealand white rabbits (2.0-2.5 kg) were anesthetized. An esophageal obstruction tube, an esophageal observation tube, and a gastric tube were inserted into the esophagus and stomach, respectively. Normal saline containing methylene blue was injected into the stomach for an animal model of gastric contents reflux. Possible saline reflux was observed through the esophageal observation tube. It was considered "regurgitation" when the saline flowed out, and "no regurgitation" when the saline did not. When a "regurgitation" result was obtained in a particular rabbit, the intracuff pressure was increased by 10 cm H(2)O in the following rabbit and vice versa. The trial was not terminated until six crossover points were observed from "no regurgitation" to "regurgitation." A probit regression model was used to analyze the effective intracuff pressure of the esophagus obstruction tube after 50 % and 95 % of the rabbits showed no reflux.
resultsThe lowest effective intracuff pressure to prevent reflux of gastric contents in 50 % of rabbits from the Dixon up-down method was 61.67 ± 8.16 cm H(2)O. The intracuff pressures at which there was 50 % and 95 % probability of lack of gastric contents reflux from a probit regression model were 61.95 and 74.39 cm H(2)O, respectively.
conclusionThe insertion of an esophageal obstruction tube before endotracheal intubation can be an acceptable method for preventing the reflux of gastric contents in most rabbits under light anesthesia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.