ReviewDer Anaesthesist2014
[Ventilator-induced diaphragm dysfunction : clinically relevant problem].
Review in Der Anaesthesist, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Increased SOD2 in the diaphragm contributes to exercise-induced protection against ventilator-induced diaphragm dysfunction.Redox biology · 2019Article
- In vitro effects of levosimendan on muscle of malignant hyperthermia susceptible and non-susceptible swine.BMC anesthesiology · 2018Article
- [Weaning ward-different from the ICU?]Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2018Article
- PINK1/Parkin-mediated mitophagy in mechanical ventilation-induced diaphragmatic dysfunction.Therapeutic advances in respiratory diseaseArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mechanical ventilation is a life-saving intervention for patients with respiratory failure or during deep sedation. During continuous mandatory ventilation the diaphragm remains inactive, which activates pathophysiological cascades leading to a loss of contractile force and muscle mass (collectively referred to as ventilator-induced diaphragm dysfunction, VIDD). In contrast to peripheral skeletal muscles this process is rapid and develops after as little as 12 h and has a profound influence on weaning patients from mechanical ventilation as well as increased incidences of morbidity and mortality. In recent years, animal experiments have revealed pathophysiological mechanisms which have been confirmed in humans. One major mechanism is the mitochondrial generation of reactive oxygen species that have been shown to damage contractile proteins and facilitate protease activation. Besides atrophy due to inactivity, drug interactions can induce further muscle atrophy. Data from animal research concerning the influence of corticosteroids emphasize a dose-dependent influence on diaphragm atrophy and function although the clinical interpretation in intensive care patients (ICU) patients might be difficult. Levosimendan has also been proven to increase diaphragm contractile forces in humans which may prove to be helpful for patients experiencing difficult weaning. Additionally, antioxidant drugs that scavenge reactive oxygen species have been demonstrated to protect the diaphragm from VIDD in several animal studies. The translation of these drugs into the IUC setting might protect patients from VIDD and facilitate the weaning process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.