Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24305181›Full record

ArticleReproduction, fertility, and development2013

Mammalian fertility preservation through cryobiology: value of classical comparative studies and the need for new preservation options.

Pierre Comizzoli, David E Wildt

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproduction, fertility, and development, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pierre ComizzoliSmithsonian Conservation Biology Institute, National Zoological Park, PO Box 37012 MRC 5502, Washington, DC 20013, USA.
David E Wildt
Orthopedic Institute · US

Funding

Drying, Storing and Reanimating Egg Germinal Vesicles to Preserve FertilityR01OD010948 · OD · SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION · PI COMIZZOLI, PIERRE · 2012 to 2015
$1.5M
Drying, Storing and Reanimating Egg Germinal Vesicles to Preserve FertilityR01RR026064 · NCRR · SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION · PI COMIZZOLI, PIERRE · 2010 to 2011
$667k
NCRR NIH HHS R01 RR026064NIH HHS R01 OD010948
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human-related fertility preservation strategies have enormous potential for helping sustain and protect other species, especially to assist managing or 'rescuing' the genomes of genetically valuable individuals, including endangered species. However, wider-scale applications are limited by significant physiological variations among species, as well as a lack of fundamental knowledge of basic reproductive traits and cryosensitivity. Systematic and comparative cryopreservation studies (e.g. on membrane biophysical properties and resilience to freezing temperatures) are required to successfully recover gametes and gonadal tissues after thawing and eventually produce healthy offspring. Such data are currently available for humans and a few laboratory and livestock animals, with virtually all other species, including wildlife, having gone unstudied. Interestingly, there also are commonalities among taxa that allow a protocol developed for one species to provide useful information or guidance for another. However, when a rare animal unexpectedly dies there is no time for a prospective understanding of that species' biophysical traits. Because the odds of success will be much lower in such instances, it is essential that more fundamental studies be directed at more species. But also worthwhile is thinking beyond these systematic characterisations to consider the potential of a 'universal preservation protocol' for animal biomaterials.

Indexed as

Endangered SpeciesFertilityReproductionSperm BanksTissue BanksAnimalsCryopreservationFemaleFertility PreservationHumansMalePregnancySpecies SpecificityTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID24305181
PMCPMC3929269
OpenAlexW2087431946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.