Trial reportJournal of cardiac failure2014
Relationship between galectin-3 levels and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist use in heart failure: analysis from HF-ACTION.
Trial report in Journal of cardiac failure, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exploring Galectin‑3 as an Emerging Frontier in Biomarker Research for Clinical Trials Approaching Cardiovascular Diseases.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2026Review
- Galectin inhibitors and nanoparticles as a novel therapeutic strategy for glioblastoma multiforme.American journal of cancer research · 2024Review
- Hypermethylation of ACADVL is involved in the high-intensity interval training-associated reduction of cardiac fibrosis in heart failure patients.Journal of translational medicine · 2023Article
- New Biomarkers and Their Potential Role in Heart Failure Treatment Optimisation-An African Perspective.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2022Review
- Circulating heart failure biomarkers beyond natriuretic peptides: review from the Biomarker Study Group of the Heart Failure Association (HFA), European Society of Cardiology (ESC).European journal of heart failure · 2021Review
- Biomarkers to Predict Reverse Remodeling and Myocardial Recovery in Heart Failure.Current heart failure reports · 2016Review
- ST2 and Galectin-3: Ready for Prime Time?EJIFCC · 2016Article
- Review
- The Current and Potential Clinical Relevance of Heart Failure Biomarkers.Current heart failure reports · 2015Review
- Biomarker Guided Therapy in Chronic Heart Failure.Cardiac failure review · 2015Article
- Article
- Direct role for smooth muscle cell mineralocorticoid receptors in vascular remodeling: novel mechanisms and clinical implications.Current hypertension reports · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGalectin-3 (Gal-3) is a marker of myocardial fibrosis, and elevated levels are associated with adverse outcomes. Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) modulate cardiac fibrosis in heart failure (HF) patients and have been shown to improve long-term outcomes. We examined whether treatment effects from MRA use differed by Gal-3 levels in ambulatory heart failure patients enrolled in HF-ACTION. METHODS AND
resultsHF-ACTION was a randomized controlled trial of exercise training versus usual care in patients with HF due to LV systolic dysfunction (New York Heart Association functional class II-IV, left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 0.35, median follow-up 2.5 years). Galectin-3 was assessed at baseline in 895 patients. The end point was all-cause mortality or all-cause hospitalization (ACM+ACH); all-cause mortality (ACM) was a key secondary end point. A differential association of MRA use by increasing Gal-3 concentration was tested with the use of interaction terms in Cox proportional hazards models, adjusted for covariates previously identified in this cohort as well as age, sex, and race. Inverse propensity-weighted (IPW) methods were also used to assess this association. Approximately one-half (n = 401) of the patients were on an MRA. There was no significant interaction for the associations of Gal-3 levels and MRA use for either end point (adjusted interaction P = .76 for ACM+ACH; P = .26 for ACM). There was no evidence of improved outcomes for patients on an MRA compared with those not on MRA for either end point (hazard ratio [HR] 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.85-1.23, P = .8; and HR = 1.15, 95% CI [0.82-1.61], P = .4; respectively). IPW analysis was consistent with the results of the adjusted analysis.
conclusionOur study showed no evidence of interaction between Gal-3 and treatment effect of MRA. Whether biomarkers may be used to predict which patients may benefit from an mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist in HF requires further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.