Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24304745›Full record

Trial reportTrials2013

Working memory training for adult hearing aid users: study protocol for a double-blind randomized active controlled trial.

Helen Henshaw, Melanie A Ferguson

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01892007 (Evaluation of Cogmed Working Memory Training to Improve Cognition, Speech Perception and Self-reported Hearing Abilities for Adult Hearing Aid Users), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01892007 nacompletednot on this map

Evaluation of Cogmed Working Memory Training to Improve Cognition, Speech Perception and Self-reported Hearing Abilities for Adult Hearing Aid Users: a Double-blind, Randomised, Active-controlled Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorNottingham University Hospitals NHS TrustRan2012 to 2014Enrolled57ConditionsHearing LossArmsCogmed RM - Online adaptive working memory training, Cogmed RM - Online non-adaptive (placebo) working memory training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Interventions to improve hearing aid use in adult auditory rehabilitation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Helen HenshawNIHR Nottingham Hearing Biomedical Research Unit, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Ropewalk House, 113 The Ropewalk, Nottingham, UK. helen.henshaw@nottingham.ac.uk.
Melanie A Ferguson

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOne in ten people aged between 55 to 74 years have a significant hearing impairment in their better hearing ear (as defined by audiometric hearing thresholds). However, it is becoming increasingly clear that the challenges faced by older listeners cannot be explained by the audiogram alone. The ability for people with hearing loss to use cognition to support speech perception allows for compensation of the degraded auditory input. This in turn offers promise for new cognitive-based rehabilitative interventions. Working memory is known to be highly associated with language comprehension and recent evidence has shown significant generalization of learning from trained working memory tasks to improvements in sentence-repetition skills of children with severe to profound hearing loss. This evidence offers support for further investigation into the potential benefits of working memory training to improve speech perception abilities in other hearing impaired populations. METHODS/

designThis is a double-blind randomized active controlled trial aiming to assess whether a program of working memory training results in improvements in untrained measures of cognition, speech perception and self-reported hearing abilities in adult hearing aid users aged (50 to 74 years) with mild-to-moderate hearing loss hearing aid users, compared with an active control group who receive a placebo version of the working memory training program. DISCUSSION: The present study aims to generate high-quality preliminary evidence for the efficacy of working memory training for adult hearing aid users with mild-to-moderate sensorineural hearing loss who are existing hearing aid users. This trial addresses a number of gaps in the published literature assessing training interventions for people with hearing loss, and in the general literature surrounding working memory training, such as the inclusion of an active control group, participant and tester blinding, and increased transparency in reporting.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01892007. Date of registration: 27 June 2013.

Indexed as

Clinical ProtocolsHearing AidsMemory, Short-TermAgedAttentionDouble-Blind MethodHumansMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health Care

Identifiers

PMID24304745
PMCPMC4235173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.