Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24304674›Full record

ArticleThe ISME journal2014

Eco-evolutionary feedbacks drive species interactions.

Andrés Andrade-Domínguez, Emmanuel Salazar, María del Carmen Vargas-Lagunas, Roberto Kolter, Sergio Encarnación

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ISME journal, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
11.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Understanding the evolution of interspecies interactions in microbial communities.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Andrés Andrade-DomínguezCentro de Ciencias Genómicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Cuernavaca, México.
Emmanuel SalazarCentro de Ciencias Genómicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Cuernavaca, México.
María del Carmen Vargas-LagunasCentro de Ciencias Genómicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Cuernavaca, México.
Roberto KolterDepartment of Microbiology and Immunobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Sergio EncarnaciónCentro de Ciencias Genómicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Cuernavaca, México.
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México · MXHarvard University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the biosphere, many species live in close proximity and can thus interact in many different ways. Such interactions are dynamic and fall along a continuum between antagonism and cooperation. Because interspecies interactions are the key to understanding biological communities, it is important to know how species interactions arise and evolve. Here, we show that the feedback between ecological and evolutionary processes has a fundamental role in the emergence and dynamics of species interaction. Using a two-species artificial community, we demonstrate that ecological processes and rapid evolution interact to influence the dynamics of the symbiosis between a eukaryote (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) and a bacterium (Rhizobium etli). The simplicity of our experimental design enables an explicit statement of causality. The niche-constructing activities of the fungus were the key ecological process: it allowed the establishment of a commensal relationship that switched to ammensalism and provided the selective conditions necessary for the adaptive evolution of the bacteria. In this latter state, the bacterial population radiates into more than five genotypes that vary with respect to nutrient transport, metabolic strategies and global regulation. Evolutionary diversification of the bacterial populations has strong effects on the community; the nature of interaction subsequently switches from ammensalism to antagonism where bacteria promote yeast extinction. Our results demonstrate the importance of the evolution-to-ecology pathway in the persistence of interactions and the stability of communities. Thus, eco-evolutionary dynamics have the potential to transform the structure and functioning of ecosystems. Our results suggest that these dynamics should be considered to improve our understanding of beneficial and detrimental host-microbe interactions.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionEcosystemMicrobial InteractionsModels, BiologicalEcologyRhizobiumSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSymbiosis

Identifiers

PMID24304674
PMCPMC3996687
OpenAlexW2013300624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.