ArticleBiomedical engineering online2013
Three types of dermal grafts in rats: the importance of mechanical property and structural design.
Article in Biomedical engineering online, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bioengineered Skin Grafts from Patient-Derived Decellularized Extracellular Matrix and Autologous Cells for Personalized Regenerative.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- The optimization of PLGA knitted mesh reinforced-collagen/chitosan scaffold for the healing of full-thickness skin defects.Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials · 2023Article
- Comparative Experimental Study of Dermal Stability: Acellular Dermal Matrix versus Crayopreserved Dermis.World journal of plastic surgery · 2021Article
- Chitosan Woven Meshes: Influence of Threads Configuration on Mechanical, Morphological, and Physiological Properties.Polymers · 2020Article
- Fabrication of Bio-Based Gelatin Sponge for Potential Use as A Functional Acellular Skin Substitute.Polymers · 2020Article
- A Novel Reticular Dermal Graft Leverages Architectural and Biological Properties to Support Wound Repair.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2016Article
- Methodologies in creating skin substitutes.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2016Review
- Textile cell-free scaffolds for in situ tissue engineering applications.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2016Review
- Topical Collagen-Based Biomaterials for Chronic Wounds: Rationale and Clinical Application.Advances in wound care · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo determine how the mechanical property and micro structure affect tissue regeneration and angiogenesis, three types of scaffolds were studied. Acellular dermal matrices (ADM), produced from human skin by removing the epidermis and cells, has been widely used in wound healing because of its high mechanical strength. Collagen scaffolds (CS) incorporated with poly(glycolide-co-L-lactide) (PLGA) mesh forms a well-supported hybrid dermal equivalent poly(glycolide-co-L-lactide) mesh/collagen scaffolds (PMCS). We designed this scaffold to enhance the CS mechanical property. These three different dermal substitutes-ADM, CS and PMCSs are different in the tensile properties and microstructure.
methodsSeveral basic physical characteristics of dermal substitutes were investigated in vitro. To characterize the angiogenesis and tissue regeneration, the materials were embedded subcutaneously in Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats. At weeks 1, 2, 4 and 8 post-surgery, the tissue specimens were harvested for histology, immunohistochemistry and real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR).
resultsIn vitro studies demonstrated ADM had a higher Young's modulus (6.94 MPa) rather than CS (0.19 MPa) and PMCS (3.33 MPa) groups in the wet state. Compared with ADMs and CSs, PMCSs with three-dimensional porous structures resembling skin and moderate mechanical properties can promote tissue ingrowth more quickly after implantation. In addition, the vascularization of the PMCS group is more obvious than that of the other two groups. The incorporation of a PLGA knitted mesh in CSs can improve the mechanical properties with little influence on the three-dimensional porous microstructure. After implantation, PMCSs can resist the contraction and promote cell infiltration, neotissue formation and blood vessel ingrowth, especially from the mesh side. Although ADM has high mechanical strength, its vascularization is poor because the pore size is too small. In conclusion, the mechanical properties of scaffolds are important for maintaining the three-dimensional microarchitecture of constructs used to induce tissue regeneration and vascularization.
conclusionThe results illustrated that tissue regeneration requires the proper pore size and an appropriate mechanical property like PMCS which could satisfy these conditions to sustain growth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.