Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24303997›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology2014

PACAP receptor pharmacology and agonist bias: analysis in primary neurons and glia from the trigeminal ganglia and transfected cells.

C S Walker, T Sundrum, D L Hay

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of pharmacology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. PACAP versus CGRP in migraine: From mouse models to clinical translation.Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. PACInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Perivascular neurotransmitters: Regulation of cerebral blood flow and role in primary headaches.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2019
    Review
  12. Molecular pharmacology of GPCRs.British journal of pharmacology · 2018
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Targeted Orexin and Hypothalamic Neuropeptides for Migraine.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2018
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. A second trigeminal CGRP receptor: function and expression of the AMY1 receptor.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2015
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

C S WalkerSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand; Centre for Brain Research, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
T Sundrum
D L Hay
University of Auckland · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeA major challenge in the development of new medicines targeting GPCRs is the ability to quantify drug action in physiologically relevant models. Primary cell models that closely resemble the clinically relevant in vivo site of drug action are important translational tools in drug development. However, pharmacological studies in these models are generally very limited due to the methodology used. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: We used a neuropeptide system to demonstrate the applicability of using highly sensitive signalling assays in primary cells. We quantified the action of pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating peptide (PACAP)-38, PACAP-27 and vasoactive intestinal polypeptide in primary cultures of neurons and glia derived from rat trigeminal ganglia (TG), comparing our observations to transfected cells. KEY

resultsPACAP-responsive receptors in rat trigeminal neurons, glia and transfected PAC1n receptors were pharmacologically distinct. PACAP-38, but not PACAP-27, activated ERK in glia, while both forms stimulated cellular cAMP production. PACAP(6-38) also displayed cell-type-dependent, agonist-specific, antagonism. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The complexity of PACAP pharmacology in the TG may help to direct, more effectively, the development of disease treatments targeting the PACAP receptor. We suggest that these methodologies are broadly applicable to other primary cell types of human or animal origin, and that our approach may allow more thorough characterization of ligand properties in physiologically relevant cell types.

Indexed as

TransfectionAnimalsChlorocebus aethiopsCOS CellsMolecular Sequence DataNeurogliaNeuronsReceptors, Pituitary Adenylate Cyclase-Activating PolypeptideReceptors, Pituitary Adenylate Cyclase-Activating Polypeptidebias signallinggliaG-protein coupled receptorintracellular signallingneuronPAC1PACAPprimary culturetrigeminal gangliaVIP

Identifiers

PMID24303997
PMCPMC3954490
OpenAlexW1533486949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.