Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24303815›Full record

ArticleClinical science (London, England : 1979)2014

Identification of four novel serum protein biomarkers in sepsis patients encoded by target genes of sepsis-related miRNAs.

Hui-juan Wang, Bao-zeng Wang, Peng-jun Zhang, Jie Deng, Zhi-rui Zhao, Xin Zhang, Kun Xiao, Dan Feng, Yan-hong Jia, You-ning Liu and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical science (London, England : 1979), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hui-juan Wang
Bao-zeng Wang‡Department of Respiratory Medicine, the Affiliated Beijing Tiantan Hospital of Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100050, China.
Peng-jun Zhang§Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, China.
Jie Deng
Zhi-rui Zhao*Department of Respiratory Medicine, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, China.
Xin Zhang*Department of Respiratory Medicine, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, China.
Kun Xiao*Department of Respiratory Medicine, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, China.
Dan Feng¶Department of Medical Statistics, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, China.
Yan-hong Jia*Department of Respiratory Medicine, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, China.
You-ning Liu*Department of Respiratory Medicine, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, China.
Li-xin Xie*Department of Respiratory Medicine, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, China.
Chinese PLA General Hospital · CNCapital Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The goal of the present study was to identify novel protein biomarkers from the target genes of six serum miRNAs that we identified previously in patients with sepsis. The target genes were predicted by bioinformatics analysis; the levels of the respective proteins in the sera of patients with sepsis were detected by ELISA. ACVR2A (activin A receptor, type IIA), FOXO1 (forkhead box O1), IHH (Indian hedgehog), STK4 (serine/threonine kinase 4) and DUSP3 (dual specificity phosphatase 3) were predicted to be the targets of the six miRNAs, and their encoded proteins were used for biomarker identification. Levels of ACVR2A (P<0.01) and FOXO1 (P<0.01) were significantly different among normal controls, patients with sepsis, patients with severe sepsis and patients with septic shock. Furthermore, levels of ACVR2A (P=0.025), FOXO1 (P<0.001), IHH (P=0.001) and STK4 (P=0.001) were differentially expressed in survivors and non-survivors. DUSP3 levels were not significantly different between any groups. Conjoin analysis of the four differentially expressed proteins showed that the area under the curve of the predictive probabilities was 0.875 [95% CI (confidence interval): 0.785-0.965], which was higher than the SOFA (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment) and APACHE II (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II) scores. When the value of predictive probabilities was 0.449, the four proteins yielded a sensitivity of 68% and a specificity of 91%. Dynamic changes in ACVR2A, FOXO1 and IHH levels showed differential expression between survivors and non-survivors at all time points. On the basis of a combined analysis of the four identified proteins, their predictive value of 28-day mortality of patients with sepsis was better than the SOFA or APACHE II scores.

Indexed as

AgedBiomarkersBlood ProteinsFemaleHumansMaleMicroRNAsMiddle AgedPrognosisSepsisBiomarkersBlood ProteinsMicroRNAs

Identifiers

PMID24303815
PMCPMC4202716
OpenAlexW2008131711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.