Embryonic Stem Cells: A Perfect Tool for Studying Mammalian Transcriptional Enhancers.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Enhancer RNA: What we know and what we can achieve.Cell proliferation · 2022
   Review
2. Nanog Expression in Embryonic Stem Cells - An Ideal Model System to Dissect Enhancer Function.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2017
   Review
3. EP-DNN: A Deep Neural Network-Based Global Enhancer Prediction Algorithm.Scientific reports · 2016
   Article
4. Enhancer transcribed RNAs arise from hypomethylated, Tet-occupied genomic regions.Epigenetics · 2013
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

Abstract

Indexed as