Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24302565›Full record

ArticleMolecular carcinogenesis2015

Consequences of germline variation disrupting the constitutional translational initiation codon start sites of MLH1 and BRCA2: Use of potential alternative start sites and implications for predicting variant pathogenicity.

Michael T Parsons, Phillip J Whiley, Jonathan Beesley, Mark Drost, Niels de Wind, Bryony A Thompson, Louise Marquart, John L Hopper, Mark A Jenkins, Australasian Colorectal Cancer Family Registry and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular carcinogenesis, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. In Silico Functional Annotation of Genomic Variation.Current protocols in human genetics · 2016
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Michael T ParsonsDepartment of Genetics and Computational Biology, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
Phillip J WhileyDepartment of Genetics and Computational Biology, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
Jonathan BeesleyDepartment of Genetics and Computational Biology, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
Mark DrostDepartment of Toxicogenetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Niels de WindDepartment of Toxicogenetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Bryony A ThompsonDepartment of Genetics and Computational Biology, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
Louise MarquartDepartment of Population Health, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
John L HopperCentre for MEGA Epidemiology, School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Mark A JenkinsCentre for MEGA Epidemiology, School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Australasian Colorectal Cancer Family Registry
Melissa A BrownSchool of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Kathy TuckerHereditary Cancer Clinic, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, Sydney, Australia.
Linda WarwickACT Genetics Service, The Canberra Hospital, Canberra, Australia.
Daniel D BuchananDepartment of Population Health, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
Amanda B SpurdleDepartment of Genetics and Computational Biology, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute · AUThe University of Queensland · AULeiden University Medical Center · NLCanberra Hospital · AUSeoul National University · KRThe University of Melbourne · AU

Funding

Colon Cancer Family Registry CohortUM1CA167551 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI HAILE, ROBERT WILLIAM, JENKINS, MARK A · 2013 to 2017
$11.3M
AUSTRALASIAN COLORECTAL CANCER FAMILY REGISTRYU01CA097735 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE · PI HOPPER, JOHN L · 2002 to 2007
$6.9M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA097735NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA167551
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Variants that disrupt the translation initiation sequences in cancer predisposition genes are generally assumed to be deleterious. However, few studies have validated these assumptions with functional and clinical data. Two cancer syndrome gene variants likely to affect native translation initiation were identified by clinical genetic testing: MLH1:c.1A>G p.(Met1?) and BRCA2:c.67+3A>G. In vitro GFP-reporter assays were conducted to assess the consequences of translation initiation disruption on alternative downstream initiation codon usage. Analysis of MLH1:c.1A>G p.(Met1?) showed that translation was mostly initiated at an in-frame position 103 nucleotides downstream, but also at two ATG sequences downstream. The protein product encoded by the in-frame transcript initiating from position c.103 showed loss of in vitro mismatch repair activity comparable to known pathogenic mutations. BRCA2:c.67+3A>G was shown by mRNA analysis to result in an aberrantly spliced transcript deleting exon 2 and the consensus ATG site. In the absence of exon 2, translation initiated mostly at an out-of-frame ATG 323 nucleotides downstream, and to a lesser extent at an in-frame ATG 370 nucleotides downstream. Initiation from any of the downstream alternative sites tested in both genes would lead to loss of protein function, but further clinical data is required to confirm if these variants are associated with a high cancer risk. Importantly, our results highlight the need for caution in interpreting the functional and clinical consequences of variation that leads to disruption of the initiation codon, since translation may not necessarily occur from the first downstream alternative start site, or from a single alternative start site.

Indexed as

Alternative SplicingCodon, InitiatorAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingBRCA2 ProteinDNA Mismatch RepairExonsGenes, BRCA2HumansMutL Protein Homolog 1NeoplasmsNuclear ProteinsProtein BiosynthesisProtein IsoformsAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingBRCA2 ProteinBRCA2 protein, humanCodon, InitiatorMLH1 protein, humanMutL Protein Homolog 1Nuclear ProteinsProtein Isoformscancer syndrome genesin vitro assayunclassified variant

Identifiers

PMID24302565
PMCPMC4041856
OpenAlexW2160004460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.