Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24302512›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2013

Factors influencing trust in doctors: a community segmentation strategy for quality improvement in healthcare.

Vijayaprasad Gopichandran, Satish Kumar Chetlapalli

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Study on edge villages based on cross-region healthcare-seeking behavior.International journal of health geographics · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Patient and Carer Understandings and Experiences of Living With Type 2 Diabetes in India.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Medical student program to learn from families experiencing developmental disabilities.International journal of developmental disabilities · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Vijayaprasad GopichandranSchool of Public Health, SRM University, Kancheepuram, Tamil Nadu, India.
Satish Kumar Chetlapalli
Indian Institute of Information Technology, Design and Manufacturing, Kancheepuram · INSRM University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTrust is a forward-looking covenant between the patient and the doctor where the patient optimistically accepts his/her vulnerability. Trust is known to improve the clinical outcomes.

objectivesTo explore the factors that determine patients' trust in doctors and to segment the community based on factors which drive their trust.

settingResource-poor urban and rural settings in Tamil Nadu, a state in southern India.

participantsA questionnaire was administered to a sample of 625 adult community-dwelling respondents from four districts of Tamil Nadu, India, chosen by multistage sampling strategy. OUTCOME MEASURES: The outcomes were to understand the main domains of factors influencing trust in doctors and to segment the community based on which of these domains predominantly influenced their trust.

resultsFactor analysis revealed five main categories, namely, comfort with the doctor, doctor with personal involvement with the patient, behaviourally competent doctor, doctor with a simple appearance and culturally competent doctor, which explained 49.3% of the total variance. Using k-means cluster analysis the respondents were segmented into four groups, namely, those who have 'comfort-based trust', 'emotionally assessed trust', who were predominantly older and belonging to lower socioeconomic status, those who had 'personal trust', who were younger people from higher socioeconomic strata of the community and the group who had 'objectively assessed trust', who were younger women.

conclusionsTrust in doctors seems to be influenced by the doctor's behaviuor, perceived comfort levels, personal involvement with the patient, and to a lesser extent by cultural competence and doctor's physical appearance. On the basis of these dimensions, the community can be segmented into distinct groups, and trust building can happen in a strategic manner which may lead to improvement in perceived quality of care.

Indexed as

Public HealthSocial Medicine

Identifiers

PMID24302512
PMCPMC3855707
OpenAlexW2137105601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.