ArticlePlanta1981
Synchronization and signal transmission in protoplasmic strands of Physarum : Effects of externally applied substances and mechanical influences.
Article in Planta, 1981. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- A brief history of liquid computers.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019Review
- Fluid flows shaping organism morphology.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The phenomenon of synchronization of contraction rhythms was investigated on isolated protoplasmic strands of Physarum polycephalum. The strands were mounted as (gymnastic) trapezes; the contraction activities of the arms were measured independently under isometric conditions; and the connecting middle part of the arms was treated in different ways to block the signal transmission between the arms. Experiments for testing the influence of different chemicals on signal transmission demonstrated that whenever a substance blocked signal transmission it also disturbed the normal oscillatory contraction activity of a single strand, the endoplasmic streaming, and the normal architecture of the strand. No substance inhibited the transmission of the synchronizing factor specifically. As a depolarizing medium, 70 mM KCl solution did not hinder phase synchronization. On the other hand, compression of the middle part with a glass needle immediately led to dissynchronization as soon as the endoplasmic flow could not pass the point of constriction. Gelation of the endoplasm by a vibrating glass needle placed at the surface of the middle part had the same effect. It is concluded that a bioelectric continuance of the plasmalemma is not sufficient for signal transmission. In contrast, an intact endoplasmic flow appears to be obligatory. According to the experimental data presented, an electrical coupling responsible for phase synchronization between the two arms seems to be unlikely. The unknown synchronizing factor is transported via endoplasmic flow, i.e., the endoplasmic stream seems to present the pacemaker of the oscillatory contraction activity.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.