Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24300669›Full record

ReviewHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2014

Recent progress in adjuvant discovery for peptide-based subunit vaccines.

Fazren Azmi, Abdullah Al Hadi Ahmad Fuaad, Mariusz Skwarczynski, Istvan Toth

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 109 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
109citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

109 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Polymer Nanoparticles Advancements for Gynecological Cancers.International journal of nanomedicine · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

49 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fazren AzmiSchool of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences; The University of Queensland; Brisbane, QLD Australia; Faculty of Pharmacy; National University Malaysia; Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Abdullah Al Hadi Ahmad Fuaad
Mariusz Skwarczynski
Istvan Toth

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peptide-based subunit vaccines are of great interest in modern immunotherapy as they are safe, easy to produce and well defined. However, peptide antigens produce a relatively weak immune response, and thus require the use of immunostimulants (adjuvants) for optimal efficacy. Developing a safe and effective adjuvant remains a challenge for peptide-based vaccine design. Recent advances in immunology have allowed researchers to have a better understanding of the immunological implication of related diseases, which facilitates more rational design of adjuvant systems. Understanding the molecular structure of the adjuvants allows the establishment of their structure-activity relationships which is useful for the development of next-generation adjuvants. This review summarizes the current state of adjuvants development in the field of synthetic peptide-based vaccines. The structural, chemical and biological properties of adjuvants associated with their immunomodulatory effects are discussed.

Indexed as

Adjuvants, ImmunologicDrug DiscoveryHumansVaccines, SubunitAdjuvants, ImmunologicVaccines, Subunitadjuvantdendritic cellpeptide vaccinetoll-like receptorvaccine delivery

Identifiers

PMID24300669
PMCPMC4130256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.