Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24300439›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2014

Automated annotation of developmental stages of Drosophila embryos in images containing spatial patterns of expression.

Lei Yuan, Cheng Pan, Shuiwang Ji, Michael McCutchan, Zhi-Hua Zhou, Stuart J Newfeld, Sudhir Kumar, Jieping Ye

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Quantitative analysis of cell shape and the cytoskeleton in developmental biology.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Developmental biology · 2018
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Stability-driven nonnegative matrix factorization to interpret spatial gene expression and build local gene networks.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lei YuanSchool of Computing, Informatics, and Decision Systems Engineering, Center for Evolutionary Medicine and Informatics, The Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA, National Key Laboratory for Novel Software Technology, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China, School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA and Center of Excellence in Genomic Medicine Research, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Cheng Pan
Shuiwang Ji
Michael McCutchan
Zhi-Hua Zhou
Stuart J Newfeld
Sudhir Kumar
Jieping Ye

Funding

Computatonal Analysis of Gene Expression Pattern ImagesR01HG002516 · NHGRI · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI KUMAR, SUDHIR · 2003 to 2013
$5.3M
Computational Methods for Expression Image AnalysisR01LM010730 · NLM · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI KUMAR, SUDHIR, YE, JIEPING · 2011 to 2013
$934k
NHGRI NIH HHS HG002516-09NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG002516NLM NIH HHS LM010730NLM NIH HHS R01 LM010730
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationDrosophila melanogaster is a major model organism for investigating the function and interconnection of animal genes in the earliest stages of embryogenesis. Today, images capturing Drosophila gene expression patterns are being produced at a higher throughput than ever before. The analysis of spatial patterns of gene expression is most biologically meaningful when images from a similar time point during development are compared. Thus, the critical first step is to determine the developmental stage of an embryo. This information is also needed to observe and analyze expression changes over developmental time. Currently, developmental stages (time) of embryos in images capturing spatial expression pattern are annotated manually, which is time- and labor-intensive. Embryos are often designated into stage ranges, making the information on developmental time course. This makes downstream analyses inefficient and biological interpretations of similarities and differences in spatial expression patterns challenging, particularly when using automated tools for analyzing expression patterns of large number of images.

resultsHere, we present a new computational approach to annotate developmental stage for Drosophila embryos in the gene expression images. In an analysis of 3724 images, the new approach shows high accuracy in predicting the developmental stage correctly (79%). In addition, it provides a stage score that enables one to more finely annotate each embryo so that they are divided into early and late periods of development within standard stage demarcations. Stage scores for all images containing expression patterns of the same gene enable a direct way to view expression changes over developmental time for any gene. We show that the genomewide-expression-maps generated using images from embryos in refined stages illuminate global gene activities and changes much better, and more refined stage annotations improve our ability to better interpret results when expression pattern matches are discovered between genes. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The software package is availablefor download at: http://www.public.asu.edu/*jye02/Software/Fly-Project/.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalImage Processing, Computer-AssistedAlgorithmsAnimalsDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsEmbryonic DevelopmentEmbryo, NonmammalianPattern Recognition, AutomatedDrosophila Proteins

Identifiers

PMID24300439
PMCPMC3892688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.