Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24299257›Full record

Trial reportTrials2013

Comparison of usual podiatric care and early physical therapy intervention for plantar heel pain: study protocol for a parallel-group randomized clinical trial.

Shane M McClinton, Timothy W Flynn, Bryan C Heiderscheit, Thomas G McPoil, Daniel Pinto, Pamela A Duffy, John D Bennett

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01865734 nacompletednot on this map

Comparison of Usual Podiatric Care and Early Physical Therapy for Plantar Heel Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorDes Moines UniversityRan2013 to 2017Enrolled95ConditionsFasciitis, PlantarArmsPhysical therapy after initial podiatry visit, Usual care provided by podiatry
NCT06172517 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Impact of Plantar Orthosis on Postural Control and Gait in Individuals With Plantar Fasciopathy

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversité du Québec à ChicoutimiRan2024 to 2024Enrolled24ConditionsRehabilitation, Aging Problems, Foot Diseases, Mobility LimitationArmsOrthosis intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Shane M McClintonRocky Mountain University of Health Professions, 561 East 1860 South, Provo, Utah 84606, USA. shane.mcclinton@dmu.edu.
Timothy W Flynn
Bryan C Heiderscheit
Thomas G McPoil
Daniel Pinto
Pamela A Duffy
John D Bennett
Des Moines University · USRocky Mountain University of Health Professions · USNorthwestern University · USRegis University · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA significant number of individuals suffer from plantar heel pain (PHP) and many go on to have chronic symptoms and continued disability. Persistence of symptoms adds to the economic burden of PHP and cost-effective solutions are needed. Currently, there is a wide variation in treatment, cost, and outcomes of care for PHP with limited information on the cost-effectiveness and comparisons of common treatment approaches. Two practice guidelines and recent evidence of effective physical therapy intervention are available to direct treatment but the timing and influence of physical therapy intervention in the multidisciplinary management of PHP is unclear. The purpose of this investigation is to compare the outcomes and costs associated with early physical therapy intervention (ePT) following initial presentation to podiatry versus usual podiatric care (uPOD) in individuals with PHP.

methodsA parallel-group, block-randomized clinical trial will compare ePT and uPOD. Both groups will be seen initially by a podiatrist before allocation to a group that will receive physical therapy intervention consisting primarily of manual therapy, exercise, and modalities, or podiatric care consisting primarily of a stretching handout, medication, injections, and orthotics. Treatment in each group will be directed by practice guidelines and a procedural manual, yet the specific intervention for each participant will be selected by the treating provider. Between-group differences in the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure 6 months following the initial visit will be the primary outcome collected by an independent investigator. In addition, differences in the European Quality of Life--Five Dimensions, Numeric Pain Rating Scale, Global Rating of Change (GROC), health-related costs, and cost-effectiveness at 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year will be compared between groups. The association between successful outcomes based on GROC score and participant expectations of recovery generally, and specific to physical therapy and podiatry treatment, will also be analyzed. DISCUSSION: This study will be the first pragmatic trial to investigate the clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of ePT and uPOD in individuals with PHP. The results will serve to inform clinical practice decisions and management guidelines of multiple disciplines.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01865734.

Indexed as

Clinical ProtocolsPhysical Therapy ModalitiesPodiatryFasciitis, PlantarHumansOutcome Assessment, Health Care

Identifiers

PMID24299257
PMCPMC3866618
OpenAlexW2155027508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.