ReviewFrontiers in human neuroscience2013
Novel insights in the rehabilitation of neglect.
Review in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Transcranial direct current stimulation in neglect rehabilitation after stroke: a systematic review.Journal of neurology · 2022Pooled it
- Trial
- Study protocol of 'Prism Adaptation in Rehabilitation': a randomized controlled trial in stroke patients with neglect.BMC neurology · 2015Trial
- Immersive Virtual Reality for Treatment of Unilateral Spatial Neglect via Eye-Tracking Biofeedback: RCT Protocol and Usability Testing.Brain sciences · 2024Article
- Treating Visual Inattention in Acute Stroke Survivors Using a Therapy Scanning Wall: A Proof-of-Concept Study.The British and Irish orthoptic journal · 2023Article
- Article
- Efficacy of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Combined With Visual Scanning Treatment on Cognitive-Behavioral Symptoms of Unilateral Spatial Neglect in Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Article
- Therapeutic Effects of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Visuospatial Neglect Revealed With Event-Related Potentials.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Article
- Translating concepts of neural repair after stroke: Structural and functional targets for recovery.Restorative neurology and neuroscience · 2020Review
- Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in stroke rehabilitation: review of the current evidence and pitfalls.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2019Review
- Treatments to Promote Neural Repair after Stroke.Journal of stroke · 2018Review
- Oculomotor prismatic training is effective in ameliorating spatial neglect: a pilot study.Experimental brain research · 2017Article
- Value and Efficacy of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in the Cognitive Rehabilitation: A Critical Review Since 2000.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2016Review
- Prism adaptation and spatial neglect: the need for dose-finding studies.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2015Article
- Novel insights into the rehabilitation of memory post acquired brain injury: a systematic review.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2014Review
- Introduction to the research topic novel insights in rehabilitation of neglect.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2014Article
- A practical application of text mining to literature on cognitive rehabilitation and enhancement through neurostimulation.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2014Review
- Visual Scanning Training for Neglect after Stroke with and without a Computerized Lane Tracking Dual Task.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2013Article
- Transcranial alternating brain stimulation at alpha frequency reduces hemispatial neglect symptoms in stroke patients.International journal of clinical and health psychology : IJCHPArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Visuospatial neglect due to right hemisphere damage, usually a stroke, is a major cause of disability, impairing the ability to perform a whole range of everyday life activities. Conventional and long-established methods for the rehabilitation of neglect like visual scanning training, optokinetic stimulation, or limb activation training have produced positive results, with varying degrees of generalization to (un)trained tasks, lasting from several minutes up to various months after training. Nevertheless, some promising novel approaches to the remediation of left visuospatial neglect have emerged in the last decade. These new therapy methods can be broadly classified into four categories. First, non-invasive brain stimulation techniques by means of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) or transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), after a period of mainly diagnostic utilization, are increasingly applied as neurorehabilitative tools. Second, two classes of drugs, dopaminergic and noradrenergic, have been investigated for their potential effectiveness in rehabilitating neglect. Third, prism adaptation treatment has been shown to improve several neglect symptoms consistently, sometimes during longer periods of time. Finally, virtual reality technologies hold new opportunities for the development of effective training techniques for neglect. They provide realistic, rich, and highly controllable training environments. In this paper the degree of effectiveness and the evidence gathered to support the therapeutic claims of these new approaches is reviewed and discussed. The conclusion is that for all these approaches there still is insufficient unbiased evidence to support their effectiveness. Further neglect rehabilitation research should focus on the maintenance of therapy results over time, on a more functional evaluation of treatment effects, on the design and execution of true replication studies and on the exploration of optimal combinations of treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.