Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24298167›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2014

The synaptic plasticity and memory hypothesis: encoding, storage and persistence.

Tomonori Takeuchi, Adrian J Duszkiewicz, Richard G M Morris

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 278 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
278citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

278 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. CaInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Ferroelectric Devices for In-Memory and In-Sensor Computing.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  15. Reductionism in Engram Neuroscience.The European journal of neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

218 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tomonori TakeuchiCentre for Cognitive and Neural Systems, University of Edinburgh, , 1 George Square, Edinburgh EH8 9JZ, UK.
Adrian J Duszkiewicz
Richard G M Morris

Funding

European Research Council 268800Medical Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The synaptic plasticity and memory hypothesis asserts that activity-dependent synaptic plasticity is induced at appropriate synapses during memory formation and is both necessary and sufficient for the encoding and trace storage of the type of memory mediated by the brain area in which it is observed. Criteria for establishing the necessity and sufficiency of such plasticity in mediating trace storage have been identified and are here reviewed in relation to new work using some of the diverse techniques of contemporary neuroscience. Evidence derived using optical imaging, molecular-genetic and optogenetic techniques in conjunction with appropriate behavioural analyses continues to offer support for the idea that changing the strength of connections between neurons is one of the major mechanisms by which engrams are stored in the brain.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalDopamineHumansMemoryNeuronal PlasticityOptogeneticsSynapsesDopaminedopamineengraminitial consolidationlong-term potentiationmemorysynaptic plasticity

Identifiers

PMID24298167
PMCPMC3843897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.