Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24298071›Full record

ReviewClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2013

CNS metastases in breast cancer: old challenge, new frontiers.

Nancy U Lin, Laleh Amiri-Kordestani, Diane Palmieri, David J Liewehr, Patricia S Steeg

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 135 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
135citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

135 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 1,284 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

75 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Nancy U LinAuthors' Affiliations: Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts; Medical Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute; Women's Cancers Section, Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology; and Biostatistics and Data Management Section, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
Laleh Amiri-Kordestani
Diane Palmieri
David J Liewehr
Patricia S Steeg
Center for Cancer Research · USCancer Institute (WIA) · INDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USNational Cancer Institute · US

Funding

Molecular Analysis of Breast Cancer Metastasis to the BrainZIABC010538 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI STEEG, PATRICIA SCHRIVER · 2009 to 2025
$17.1M
Molecular Analysis of Breast Cancer Metastasis to the BrainZ01BC010538 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI STEEG, PATRICIA SCHRIVER · 2003 to 2008
$1.3M
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 BC010538
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite major therapeutic advances in the management of patients with breast cancer, central nervous system (CNS) metastases remain an intractable problem, particularly in patients with metastatic HER2-positive and triple-negative breast cancer. As systemic therapies to treat extracranial disease improve, some patients are surviving longer, and the frequency of CNS involvement seems to be increasing. Furthermore, in the early-stage setting, the CNS remains a potential sanctuary site for relapse. This review highlights advances in the development of biologically relevant preclinical models, including the development of brain-tropic cell lines for testing of agents to prevent and treat brain metastases, and summarizes our current understanding of the biology of CNS relapse. From a clinical perspective, a variety of therapeutic approaches are discussed, including methods to improve drug delivery, novel cytotoxic agents, and targeted therapies. Challenges in current trial design and endpoints are reviewed. Finally, we discuss promising new directions, including novel trial designs, correlative imaging techniques, and enhanced translational opportunities.

Indexed as

Angiogenesis InhibitorsAnimalsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicBreast NeoplasmsCentral Nervous System NeoplasmsClinical Trials as TopicFemaleHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPaclitaxelRadionuclide ImagingRadiopharmaceuticalsTrastuzumabAngiogenesis InhibitorsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicPaclitaxelRadiopharmaceuticalsTrastuzumab

Identifiers

PMID24298071
PMCPMC7580496
OpenAlexW2154290856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.