Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24297760›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of behavioral medicine2014

Dimensional or categorical approach to tinnitus severity: an item response mixture modeling analysis of tinnitus handicap.

Hugo Hesser, Gerhard Andersson

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of behavioral medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hugo HesserDepartment of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Linköping University, 581 83, Linköping, Sweden, hugo.hesser@liu.se.
Gerhard Andersson
Linköping University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhether handicap due to tinnitus-sound(s) in the ears and/or in the head in the absence of an external auditory source-is best conceived as dimensional or categorical remains an unanswered empirical question. PURPOSE: The objective was to investigate whether tinnitus severity was best conceptualized as qualitatively distinct subtypes, quantitative differences varying along a single continuum, or as severity differences within subtypes.

methodsVarious forms of item response mixture models (latent class models, factor analysis models, and hybrid models) that corresponded to the competing hypotheses were fitted to item responses on the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory in a Swedish sample of individuals with tinnitus (N = 362).

resultsA latent class model could be fitted to the data with a high probability of correctly classifying individuals into three different classes: high-, moderate-, and low-severity classes. However, a comparison of models showed that a unidimensional factor analysis model with a single class provided the best fit to the data.

conclusionsThe analysis provided evidence that tinnitus severity varies along a single severity continuum from mild to moderate to severe tinnitus-related handicap. The result that tinnitus severity exists on a continuum rather than as discrete categories has important implications for clinical research.

Indexed as

Severity of Illness IndexAdultHumansMaleMiddle AgedModels, StatisticalSwedenTinnitus

Identifiers

PMID24297760
OpenAlexW2015124138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.