Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24297666›Full record

Trial reportJournal of general internal medicine2014

Internists' attitudes about assessing and maintaining clinical competence.

Thomas H Gallagher, Carolyn D Prouty, Douglas M Brock, Joshua M Liao, Arlene Weissman, Eric S Holmboe

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of general internal medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Maintaining competence in general internal medicine.Journal of general internal medicine · 2015
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Thomas H GallagherDepartment of Medicine, University of Washington, 4311-11th Ave NE, Suite 230, Seattle, WA, 98015-6367, USA, thomasg@uw.edu.
Carolyn D Prouty
Douglas M Brock
Joshua M Liao
Arlene Weissman
Eric S Holmboe

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImportant changes are occurring in how the medical profession approaches assessing and maintaining competence. Physician support for such changes will be essential for their success.

objectiveTo describe physician attitudes towards assessing and maintaining competence.

designCross-sectional internet survey.

participantsRandom sample of 1,000 American College of Physicians members who were eligible to participate in the American Board of Internal Medicine Maintenance of Certification program. MAIN MEASURES: Questions assessed physicians' attitudes and experiences regarding: 1) self-regulation, 2) feedback on knowledge and clinical care, 3) demonstrating knowledge and clinical competence, 4) frequency of use and effectiveness of methods to assess or improve clinical care, and 5) transparency. KEY

resultsSurveys were completed by 446 of 943 eligible respondents (47%). Eighty percent reported it was important (somewhat/very) to receive feedback on their knowledge, and 94% considered it important (somewhat/very) to get feedback on their quality of care. However, only 24% reported that they receive useful feedback on their knowledge most/all of the time, and 27% reported receiving useful feedback on their clinical care most/all of the time. Seventy-five percent agreed that participating in programs to assess their knowledge is important to staying up-to-date, yet only 52% reported participating in such programs within the last 3 years. The majority (58%) believed physicians should be required to demonstrate their knowledge via a secure examination every 9-10 years. Support was low for Specialty Certification Boards making information about physician competence publically available, with respondents expressing concern about patients misinterpreting information about their Board Certification activities.

conclusionsA gap exists between physicians' interest in feedback on their competence and existing programs' ability to provide such feedback. Educating physicians about the importance of regularly assessing their knowledge and quality of care, coupled with enhanced systems to provide such feedback, is needed to close this gap.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelAdultClinical CompetenceCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInternal MedicineMaleMiddle AgedPhysicians

Identifiers

PMID24297666
PMCPMC3965737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.