ArticlePacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing2014
Imputation-based assessment of next generation rare exome variant arrays.
Article in Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing for Cardiovascular Disease: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation · 2025Review
- Association analysis of exome variants and refraction, axial length, and corneal curvature in a European-American population.Human mutation · 2018Article
- The critical needs and challenges for genetic architecture studies in Africa.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2018Review
- Imputation-Aware Tag SNP Selection To Improve Power for Large-Scale, Multi-ethnic Association Studies.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2018Article
- CDKN2A Copy Number Loss Is an Independent Prognostic Factor in HPV-Negative Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2018Article
- Assessing accuracy of imputation using different SNP panel densities in a multi-breed sheep population.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2016Article
- Exome genotyping arrays to identify rare and low frequency variants associated with epithelial ovarian cancer risk.Human molecular genetics · 2016Article
- A new strategy for enhancing imputation quality of rare variants from next-generation sequencing data via combining SNP and exome chip data.BMC genomics · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A striking finding from recent large-scale sequencing efforts is that the vast majority of variants in the human genome are rare and found within single populations or lineages. These observations hold important implications for the design of the next round of disease variant discovery efforts-if genetic variants that influence disease risk follow the same trend, then we expect to see population-specific disease associations that require large sample sizes for detection. To address this challenge, and due to the still prohibitive cost of sequencing large cohorts, researchers have developed a new generation of low-cost genotyping arrays that assay rare variation previously identified from large exome sequencing studies. Genotyping approaches rely not only on directly observing variants, but also on phasing and imputation methods that use publicly available reference panels to infer unobserved variants in a study cohort. Rare variant exome arrays are intentionally enriched for variants likely to be disease causing, and here we assay the ability of the first commercially available rare exome variant array (the Illumina Infinium HumanExome BeadChip) to also tag other potentially damaging variants not molecularly assayed. Using full sequence data from chromosome 22 from the phase I 1000 Genomes Project, we evaluate three methods for imputation (BEAGLE, MaCH-Admix, and SHAPEIT2/IMPUTE2) with the rare exome variant array under varied study panel sizes, reference panel sizes, and LD structures via population differences. We find that imputation is more accurate across both the genome and exome for common variant arrays than the next generation array for all allele frequencies, including rare alleles. We also find that imputation is the least accurate in African populations, and accuracy is substantially improved for rare variants when the same population is included in the reference panel. Depending on the goals of GWAS researchers, our results will aid budget decisions by helping determine whether money is best spent sequencing the genomes of smaller sample sizes, genotyping larger sample sizes with rare and/or common variant arrays and imputing SNPs, or some combination of the two.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24297551PMC3900244What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.