Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24297458›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied genetics2014

Application of array comparative genomic hybridization in 256 patients with developmental delay or intellectual disability.

Magdalena Bartnik, Beata Nowakowska, Katarzyna Derwińska, Barbara Wiśniowiecka-Kowalnik, Marta Kędzior, Joanna Bernaciak, Kamila Ziemkiewicz, Tomasz Gambin, Maciej Sykulski, Natalia Bezniakow and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Magdalena BartnikDepartment of Medical Genetics, Institute of Mother and Child, Warsaw, Poland.
Beata Nowakowska
Katarzyna Derwińska
Barbara Wiśniowiecka-Kowalnik
Marta Kędzior
Joanna Bernaciak
Kamila Ziemkiewicz
Tomasz Gambin
Maciej Sykulski
Natalia Bezniakow
Lech Korniszewski
Anna Kutkowska-Kaźmierczak
Jakub Klapecki
Krzysztof Szczałuba
Chad A Shaw
Tadeusz Mazurczak
Anna Gambin
Ewa Obersztyn
Ewa Bocian
Paweł Stankiewicz

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We used whole-genome exon-targeted oligonucleotide array comparative genomic hybridization (array CGH) in a cohort of 256 patients with developmental delay (DD)/intellectual disability (ID) with or without dysmorphic features, additional neurodevelopmental abnormalities, and/or congenital malformations. In 69 patients, we identified 84 non-polymorphic copy-number variants, among which 41 are known to be clinically relevant, including two recently described deletions, 4q21.21q21.22 and 17q24.2. Chromosomal microarray analysis revealed also 15 potentially pathogenic changes, including three rare deletions, 5q35.3, 10q21.3, and 13q12.11. Additionally, we found 28 copy-number variants of unknown clinical significance. Our results further support the notion that copy-number variants significantly contribute to the genetic etiology of DD/ID and emphasize the efficacy of the detection of novel candidate genes for neurodevelopmental disorders by whole-genome array CGH.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesComparative Genomic HybridizationDevelopmental DisabilitiesDNA Copy Number VariationsExonsFemaleGene DosageGenome, HumanHumansInfantIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceIntellectual Disability

Identifiers

PMID24297458
PMCPMC3909616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.